Re: Opinions on pychecker bug 137320?

2003-09-14 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 13:32, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: [...] > Actually, the kicker is, pychecker isn't a Python script - it's a shell > script (condensed below): [...] Using a script like this to pick which version of python to use seems wierd to me... it doesn't have much benefits over just using

Re: Opinions on pychecker bug 137320?

2003-09-10 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> for this scheme, you don't need to make /usr/bin/pychecker handle > alternate python versions explicitly. Just put '#!/usr/bin/python' at > the front, and the correct /usr/lib/pythonX.Y will be on the pythonpath. > If they explicitly use a different python version by running; > > $ python2.1 /us

Re: Opinions on pychecker bug 137320?

2003-09-10 Thread Donovan Baarda
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 05:06, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > Hi, > > I've taken over the pychecker package from Arto Jantunen, and I'm > looking over the remaining bugs. One of the three is #137320: > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=137320 > > It requests that the Pychecker mo

Opinions on pychecker bug 137320?

2003-09-10 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
Hi, I've taken over the pychecker package from Arto Jantunen, and I'm looking over the remaining bugs. One of the three is #137320: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=137320 It requests that the Pychecker modules be installed in the Python search path, so they can be imported,