Re: Packaging plugins for Python applications

2009-06-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jakub Wilk , 2009-05-29, 21:01: What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python application under? DPMT or PAPT? And, is there some recommended binary package naming scheme for such packages? I am asking those questions, because I intend[1] to package hg-git[2], a plugin for

Re: Packaging plugins for Python applications

2009-05-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jakub Wilk escribió: > Well, technically Mercurial extensions *are* public Python modules. You > can import one into your own Python program and fiddle with it. Most > users would never do such a thing, yet it is perfectly feasible and can > be proven useful. Ok, I misunderstood you. I thought hg-

Re: Packaging plugins for Python applications

2009-05-30 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/5/29 Jakub Wilk : > Hello, > > What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python application > under? DPMT or PAPT? > Depends how you package it. If you "inject" it into the app's private modules folder eg /usr/share/APPLICATION/plugins/ then I think it is safe to go into PAPT. If

Re: Packaging plugins for Python applications

2009-05-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort , 2009-05-30, 01:42: What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python application under? DPMT or PAPT? PAPT, since it's not a module And, is there some recommended binary package naming scheme for such packages? Nope, there's only one for modules, but t

Re: Packaging plugins for Python applications

2009-05-29 Thread Ben Finney
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > Jakub Wilk escribió: > > What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python > > application under? DPMT or PAPT? > > PAPT, since it's not a module Hmm? I can't see a reasonable way to package a Python application plug-in that *isn't* a module (or a Py

Re: Packaging plugins for Python applications

2009-05-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Jakub Wilk escribió: > Hello, Hi Jakub, > What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python > application under? DPMT or PAPT? PAPT, since it's not a module > And, is there some recommended binary package naming scheme for such > packages? Nope, there's only one for modules, but th

Packaging plugins for Python applications

2009-05-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
Hello, What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python application under? DPMT or PAPT? And, is there some recommended binary package naming scheme for such packages? I am asking those questions, because I intend[1] to package hg-git[2], a plugin for Mercurial (maintained by P