Ross Vandegrift, 2014-03-20 20:40:21 -0400 :
> Hello,
Hi again,
I haven't heard much about the packaging of Paperwork and its
dependencies recently… can I do anything to help?
Roland.
--
Roland Mas
We reject: kings, presidents and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and running code. -
[Ross Vandegrift, 2014-03-24]
> Thanks for the help! I have a question on one bit of lintian4py
> output. What should I do with this:
>
> e: python-pyocr: missing-dependency-on-byte-compilation-helper
> pycompile => python (>= 2.6.5)
if you have "python:any" in Depends, please send patches to l
Hi Ross, sorry for the late reply.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> e: python-pyocr: missing-dependency-on-byte-compilation-helper
> pycompile => python (>= 2.6.5)
>
> Does this indicate a problem in my Build-Depends on python-all and
> python3-all?
No, that is about bin
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> I think Lintian4Python installs a 'lintian4py-info(1)' command to do the
> same thing. You can then get an explanation with::
>
> $ lintian4py-info --tags missing-dependency-on-byte-compilation-helper
It's still not particularly informative
Ross Vandegrift writes:
> I have a question on one bit of lintian4py output. What should I do
> with this:
>
> e: python-pyocr: missing-dependency-on-byte-compilation-helper
> pycompile => python (>= 2.6.5)
>
> Does this indicate a problem in my Build-Depends on python-all and
> python3-all?
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the help! I have a question on one bit of lintian4py
output. What should I do with this:
e: python-pyocr: missing-dependency-on-byte-compilation-helper
pycompile => python (>= 2.6.5)
Does this indicate a problem in my Build
Also, please run lintian4python to inspect your packages. It reports
some errors, like:
e: python3-pyinsane: pyflakes-undefined-name
usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyinsane/rawapi.py:62: cmp
e: python3-pyinsane: pyflakes-undefined-name
usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pyinsane/rawapi.py:425: MAX_USERN
Hi Ross,
I cannot upload your packages, but I had a quick look at them. They
mostly look good, but there are minor issues:
- Your copyright files don't comply to copyright format 1.0.
- The license description should be indented with a space.
- You shouldn't refer to symlinks like /usr/shar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am working on packaging a python application along with its
dependencies. This is my first shot at official Debian packages, so
would appreciate any comments on my work!
The modules are in the "debian" branches of:
python-pocr https://g
Hello Jakub, thanks for having a look.
Hello Andreas, I've fixed the issues Jakub pointed out (see below), and
if the package now passes your scrutiny I'd ask for sponsoring.
best regards,
Gert
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Gert Wollny , 2013-12-10, 18:22:
> >Vcs
* Gert Wollny , 2013-12-10, 18:22:
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/?p=debian-med/pymia.git;a=summary
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/pymia.git
I had a 5-seconds look at the source package:
Typo in the package description: apropriate -> appropriate
python3-mia(-dbg) should
Hello,
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:44 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2013-12-10, 13:17:
> >On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:41:38PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
> [...]
> >>I have one reservation about multi-arch support: Is a python *.so
> >>module considered a shared library in the sense tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
