Stefano Rivera <stef...@rivera.za.net> writes: > Hi Jakub (2010.05.17_20:01:25_+0200) > > 19 packages uses syntax constructs specific to Python 2.5+ in their > > public modules but don't declare that minimum supported version is > > 2.5. I'm looking for volunteers to do MBF. > > Done, only 13 real bugs. […]
Thanks for filing those, Stefano. > All the bugs were just errors thrown in the python-support hook, […] I admit to being surprised that it was attempting to compile for Python 2.4 when that version isn't supported any longer. Do we consider it a bug that ‘python-support’ is attempting to compile for Python versions we don't support? Should it constrain itself only to those Python versions supported? That leads, though, to the question of what to do about systems which upgrade to Squeeze but still have Python 2.4 installed. -- \ “Often, the surest way to convey misinformation is to tell the | `\ strict truth.” —Mark Twain, _Following the Equator_ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8739xpkit9.fsf...@benfinney.id.au
