Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 04:04:36PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained > since 2015 [2][3]. > > The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to > nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python st

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

anorack Fixed upstream in 0.2.8. mwic Fixed upstream in 0.7.9. python-djvulibre Fixed upstream in 0.8.7. This one should probably be removed, though: there are no rev-deps, it's orphaned in Debian, and it's likely to be orphaned upstream soon too. -- Jakub Wilk

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 04:04:36PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Andrey Rahmatullin >dateparser (U) Fixing this now, thanks! Note that in this case nose usage was removed some time ago but the deps remained, some other packages may be similarly trivial to fix. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 04:04:36PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Antonio Terceiro >python-ofxclient (U) >rows (U) can't fix those right away, but I think you should just go ahead and do the MBF. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 16:04:36 +0300 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and > unmaintained since 2015 [2][3]. > > The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to > switch to nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python stand

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

Hi Dmitry (2022.08.21_13:04:36_+) > Stefano Rivera >dh-python (U) Fixed in git. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

Dmitry Shachnev, le dim. 21 août 2022 16:18:53 +0300, a ecrit: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 03:11:59PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Dmitry Shachnev, le dim. 21 août 2022 16:04:36 +0300, a ecrit: > > > Samuel Thibault > > >dogtail > > > > ? it's using python3-nose2, not python-

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

Hi Samuel! On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 03:11:59PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Dmitry Shachnev, le dim. 21 août 2022 16:04:36 +0300, a ecrit: > > Samuel Thibault > >dogtail > > ? it's using python3-nose2, not python-nose. debian/tests/control uses python3-nose: https://sources.deb

Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

Hello, Dmitry Shachnev, le dim. 21 août 2022 16:04:36 +0300, a ecrit: > Samuel Thibault >dogtail ? it's using python3-nose2, not python-nose. Samuel

Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

Hi, nose [1] is a testing framework for Python, which is dead and unmaintained since 2015 [2][3]. The former maintainer of nose recommends projects using nose to switch to nose2 [4], pytest [5] or unittest from Python standard library [6]. There is a script called nose2pytest [7] which can assist