On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > I agree, but... why not wait until python 2.1.1 is released?
> > (or, if we just discuss things a bit, it will be
> > released before any action is taken and we can jump right
> > to i
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:02:05PM -0400, Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:36:28PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
>
> I vote to change over, the sooner the better.
That was me not Gregor, sorry about that.
--
Harry Henry Gebel
West Dover Hundred, Delaware
GPG encrypted email
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:36:28PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
I vote to change over, the sooner the better.
--
Harry Henry Gebel
West Dover Hundred, Delaware
GPG encrypted email gladly accepted. Key ID: B853FFFE
Fingerprint: 15A6 F58D AEED 5680 B41A 61FE 5A5F BB51 B853 FFFE
pgp4n18tJ6f9G.p
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:50:01PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:42:30PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > >
> >
> > well, some time ago I symlinked some modules from python1.5 to python2.0
> > (binary ones) and surprisingly they worked (python just printed warning
>
Gregor Hoffleit writes:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> > I agree, but... why not wait until python 2.1.1 is released?
> > (or, if we just discuss things a bit, it will be
> > released before any action is taken and we can jump right
> > to it :-))
sure, t
Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> IMHO this is the point where we should make a big step, and enforce a quick
> transition of the archive to Python 2.0.1.
Yes please. Packages named python suck. I'm willing to work on
rebuilding packages or whatever else needs to be done.
Neil
Please go ahead! The fewer nameX type packages the better.
Should be no problems for plucker (=me)
/Micce
--
Mikael Hedin, MSc +46 (0)980 79176
Swedish Institute of Space Physics +46 (0)8 344979 (home)
Box 812, S-981 28 KIRUNA, Sweden+46 (0)70 5891533 (mobile)
[gpg key fi
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:42:30PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> >
> > With the default setup, stuff in /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages would be
> > ignored by 2.0.1. In order to make the transition easier, we might decide
> > t
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> I agree, but... why not wait until python 2.1.1 is released?
> (or, if we just discuss things a bit, it will be
> released before any action is taken and we can jump right
> to it :-))
>
> You still need to modify packages when goi
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
>
> With the default setup, stuff in /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages would be
> ignored by 2.0.1. In order to make the transition easier, we might decide to
> append /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages to the sys.path, though:
>
> Alm
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:36:28PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> Hi,
...
>
> This would mean that I upload new versions of the Python packages:
>
> (1) python2 (python2-base etc.) would be removed
>
> (2) python 2.0.1-1 (python-base etc.) would replace python 1.5.2-16
>
> (3) A new set
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:47:28AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:36:28PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> > This would mean that I upload new versions of the Python packages:
> > (1) python2 (python2-base etc.) would be removed
> > (2) python 2.0.1-1 (python-base etc.)
On 26 Jun 2001 00:47:28 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
[snip]
> If you can make upgrades work; if you can not break too many
> people's testing or unstable systems; and if you can get everything
> rewritten/rebuilt relatively quickly, I'd say it's worth doing.
err.. em.. unstable systems are there to
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:36:28PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> This would mean that I upload new versions of the Python packages:
> (1) python2 (python2-base etc.) would be removed
> (2) python 2.0.1-1 (python-base etc.) would replace python 1.5.2-16
> (3) A new set of legacy packages pyt
On 25 Jun 2001 16:36:28 +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
[tech stuff snipped]
> Still I think it is much preferable to make this transition before the
> release of woody; when we release woody with python2-* packages this will be
> a big unnecessary burden for the next release; when we make the migrat
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:36:28PM +0200, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> (3) A new set of legacy packages python15 (python152 ???) for those who
> think that they depend on the old version 1.5.2.
I wouldn't even bother with that, if everything C needs recompiling
anyway, just recompile for 2.0 o
Hi,
Python 2.0.1 is out, finally with a GPL compatible license. Zope 2.3.3 works
fine with Python 2.0; I'm not aware of any problems with Debian packages
wrt. Python 2.x. That nullifies all reasons for the existance of dual Python
packages in Debian (cf. /usr/share/doc/python2/README.why-python2)
17 matches
Mail list logo
