Thanks for the update Piotr! I wish I could have made it, but it conflicted
with family vacations.
On Aug 08, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>At DebConf11 in Banja Luka, we had a short discussion¹ about Python 3
>support in Debian. Apparently everything is very good, nobody
>complaine
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:50 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> We discussed /usr/bin/python2 symlink issue shortly and we all agreed
> that we don't want Debian to use it (should helpers change shebangs back
> to /usr/bin/python? Should lintian warn about it?) although we might
> want to ship it with
* Jakub Wilk , 2011-08-09, 01:08:
We discussed /usr/bin/python2 symlink issue shortly and we all agreed
that we don't want Debian to use it (should helpers change shebangs
back to /usr/bin/python? Should lintian warn about it?)
I'm surprised to see that lintian doesn't already emit
unusual-in
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-08-08, 23:50:
We discussed /usr/bin/python2 symlink issue shortly and we all agreed
that we don't want Debian to use it (should helpers change shebangs
back to /usr/bin/python? Should lintian warn about it?)
I'm surprised to see that lintian doesn't already emit
unusu
At DebConf11 in Banja Luka, we had a short discussion¹ about Python 3
support in Debian. Apparently everything is very good, nobody
complained², no feature request for dh_python3... so I talked a little
bit about PEP 3147, PEP 3149, new and shiny PEP 402 and about status of
py3multibuild GSoC proje
5 matches
Mail list logo
