For the record,
I usually go for github upstream because (as state by other) documentation and
unittests are usually missing from pypi.
And IMHO, no package should be uploaded without running unittest :-)
Regards, Adam
On September 29, 2021 9:44:13 PM GMT+02:00, Dominik George
wrote:
>Hi,
>
Le mer. 29 sept. 2021 à 23:14, Dominik George a
écrit :
>
> > and that will require an upstream new release, which does not help
> > when you want/need to package the current one
>
> Most upstreams kindly make . post releases immediately.
>
I found that to be pretty rare in my own experience.
> and that will require an upstream new release, which does not help
> when you want/need to package the current one
Most upstreams kindly make . post releases immediately.
Maybe I am just lucky with upstreams...
-nik
> That's an upstream bug then, and upstream should fix that and ship a complete
> source tarball.
>
> I always submit pull requests updating MANIFEST.in and until now, all
> upstreams have accepted them.
and that will require an upstream new release, which does not help
when you want/need to
On 2021-09-29 16:32:05 -0400 (-0400), Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > One note: I'd consider watching for PyPI instead of GitHub.
>
> there was actually a recent discussion on this list, discouraging
> from using PyPI in favor of github, since GH tarball usually
> contains docs, tests, and other files
> there was actually a recent discussion on this list, discouraging from
> using PyPI in favor of github, since GH tarball usually contains docs,
> tests, and other files useful when building from source, usually not
> included in tarball released to users, ie pypi
That's an upstream bug then,
> One note: I'd consider watching for PyPI instead of GitHub.
there was actually a recent discussion on this list, discouraging from
using PyPI in favor of github, since GH tarball usually contains docs,
tests, and other files useful when building from source, usually not
included in tarball
Hi,
> Could someone please upload this little package ? It's a dependency of
> xsdata, an awesome XML/dataclasses library I'd like to get into the archive.
uploaded, thanks for your contribution!
One note: I'd consider watching for PyPI instead of GitHub.
Cheers,
Nik
Hi,
Great, I'll be available tomorrow (UTC+2) if you want me to do some changes.
Adam.
On September 28, 2021 11:38:15 PM GMT+02:00, Dominik George
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>> Could someone please upload this little package ? It's a dependency of
>> xsdata, an awesome XML/dataclasses library I'd like
Hi,
> Could someone please upload this little package ? It's a dependency of
> xsdata, an awesome XML/dataclasses library I'd like to get into the archive.
I will check it tomorrow.
-nik
Hello,
Could someone please upload this little package ? It's a dependency of
xsdata, an awesome XML/dataclasses library I'd like to get into the archive.
ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976443
Salsa:
11 matches
Mail list logo
