Updated status of ZODB packaging.
I didn't write it in my previous mail because there was still a lot time before
deadlines but now, it's becoming short. I'd like to see ZODB updated for
Stretch, at least that's what I had in mind when I started months ago. Having a
very old version of ZODB unt
Le 12/05/16 à 20:21, Julien Muchembled a écrit :
> So I plan to create only 3 new packages in DPMT:
> - python-btrees
> - python-zc.customdoctests
> - zodbpickle
I am also preparing an update for python-persistent.
But for all that, I followed https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging and
ther
Le 11/04/16 à 16:15, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
> On Friday, November 04, 2016 10:47:32 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Nov 03, 2016, at 08:36 PM, Julien Muchembled wrote:
>>> Not sure if all python-modules repositories are like persistent, but for
>>> me, mixing Debian work with imported tarballs in t
On Friday, November 04, 2016 10:47:32 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 03, 2016, at 08:36 PM, Julien Muchembled wrote:
> >I'm used to gbp. I don't know git-dpm (or I forgot after seeing I would not
> >like?)
>
> git-dpm is usually pretty easy, but it's really only used in a few cases,
> such as imp
On Nov 03, 2016, at 08:36 PM, Julien Muchembled wrote:
>I'm used to gbp. I don't know git-dpm (or I forgot after seeing I would not
>like?)
git-dpm is usually pretty easy, but it's really only used in a few cases, such
as importing a new upstream, managing the patch stack, and tagging. We
docume
Le 11/02/16 à 23:51, Barry Warsaw a écrit :
> On Nov 02, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>> This has already been discussed but all the packages in pkg-zope SVN
>> repository will have to be moved to python-{modules, apps} repositories
>> (because there is almost no activity on pkg
Le 11/02/16 à 04:41, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Julien Muchembled wrote:
>
>> Bug#842870: ITP: zodbpickle -- Fork of pickle module, for ZODB
>
> Please ensure the security team are informed about this fork, via
> their embedded-code-copies file:
>
> https://wiki.debian
Hi,
Barry Warsaw writes:
> +1. I do still touch some of the ztk packages and would dearly love
> to ditch svn, but just haven't had the time to think about a proper
> migration. Should we just admit defeat and do on-demand conversions,
> preserving history if possible but not worrying ab
On November 2, 2016 6:51:56 PM EDT, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>On Nov 02, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>
>>> I write to debian-python, because some of the involved packages
>are
>>> not specific to Zope. Actually, I even think that ZODB itself is
>not
>>> specific to Zope, but well,
On Nov 02, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>> I write to debian-python, because some of the involved packages are
>> not specific to Zope. Actually, I even think that ZODB itself is not
>> specific to Zope, but well, changing section of existing packages can
>> be another topic.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Julien Muchembled wrote:
> Bug#842870: ITP: zodbpickle -- Fork of pickle module, for ZODB
Please ensure the security team are informed about this fork, via
their embedded-code-copies file:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.deb
Hi,
> I write to debian-python, because some of the involved packages are
> not specific to Zope. Actually, I even think that ZODB itself is not
> specific to Zope, but well, changing section of existing packages can
> be another topic.
This has already been discussed but all the package
Le 11/01/16 à 20:10, Julien Muchembled a écrit :
> * python-btrees & python-zodbpickle (done)
> https://github.com/zopefoundation/BTrees
> https://github.com/zopefoundation/zodbpickle
>
> - new packages
> - Debian Python Modules Team
>
> [...]
>
> * python-zeo (not started)
> https://github.com/
13 matches
Mail list logo
