On 2021-05-10 16:06, Martin wrote:
> On 2021-05-10 14:00, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough
>> to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons
>> that I am not aware of?
>
> I don't have a problem with slow dev
On 2021-05-10 14:00, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough
> to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons
> that I am not aware of?
I don't have a problem with slow development, but the current
version is probabl
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:35:41AM +, Martin wrote:
> Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported
> to Python 3 recently, development slowed down since long and the
> current 1.5.x release series is not yet "there".
>
> I wonder, whether the package should be part of Debian
Hi Martin,
On 2021-05-10 13:35, Martin wrote:
> trac is a long-time Debian package, uploaded first by Jesus
> Climent in 2004. I like the traditional look of Trac and its
> climate-friendly resource usage :-)
>
> Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported
> to Python 3 recen
Dears,
trac is a long-time Debian package, uploaded first by Jesus
Climent in 2004. I like the traditional look of Trac and its
climate-friendly resource usage :-)
Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported
to Python 3 recently, development slowed down since long and the
cur
5 matches
Mail list logo
