Le samedi 13 octobre 2007 à 18:29 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> > Given the number of packages that don't follow the policy or declare
> > wrong values in XS-Python-Version, for most packages it was possible to
> > decide only by looking at debian/rules by hand.
>
> Policy does not require to s
> Given the number of packages that don't follow the policy or declare
> wrong values in XS-Python-Version, for most packages it was possible to
> decide only by looking at debian/rules by hand.
Policy does not require to set XS-Python-Version except for pycentral -
at least that's how Manoj[1] a
Le vendredi 12 octobre 2007 à 22:40 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Is there code available that can be used to reproduce this list from
> Packages/Sources? I would very much prefer to be able to generate an
> authoritative list of per-arch binaries that need to be binNMUed, so that
> the progre
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:04:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I cannot say that the situation looks good. Since the last transition,
> many new packages have been introduced, and a large part of them don't
> support the current policy. Another bad news is that it isn't possible
> to rely on t
[-release dropped, as this subthread is no longer on topic.]
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If anyone has ideas about how to deal with such cases, I'm all open for
> implementing them. It would be easy for python-support to maintain a
> list of files that should be symbolic links
Le jeudi 11 octobre 2007 à 14:44 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Still, it would be nice to build extensions for all python versions, but
> > the fact they are private makes this process more complicated.
>
> ... particularly given that neither
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Still, it would be nice to build extensions for all python versions, but
> the fact they are private makes this process more complicated.
... particularly given that neither python-support (which BitPim
currently uses) nor python-central actually sup
Le lundi 08 octobre 2007 à 15:59 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit :
> > The following packages need a round of binNMUs as soon as possible, to
> > build extensions for python2.5, after which they shouldn't bother us.
> > Can anyone schedule the binNMUs please?
> > bitpim
>
> Please don't bothe
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following packages need a round of binNMUs as soon as possible, to
> build extensions for python2.5, after which they shouldn't bother us.
> Can anyone schedule the binNMUs please?
> bitpim
Please don't bother with this one; BitPim actual
Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 13:26 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> I indeed didn't know about rtupdate - it seems to be missing on
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/
As some changes that were accepted 7 months ago have still not been
integrated into the policy, I wouldn't
> Which is quite annoying for the transition of python to testing.
>
> I have sent you a multi-build patch for mod-wsgi. As you can see, it
> isn't that complicated. And for most packages in the list, the required
> changes are much simpler.
I indeed didn't know about rtupdate - it seems to be m
Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 12:21 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> > Sorry , but there is a very good reason to do so: If the default python
> > version changes running applications with mod-wsgi will badly fail.
> > Therefore it depends in a relaxed way (python <<2.5, but >=2.4) on the
> > actual
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 09:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>>> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
binNMUs, as some dependen
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 09:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>>> The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
>>> binNMUs, as some dependencies were relaxed in python
Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 09:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
> > binNMUs, as some dependencies were relaxed in python-support 0.7.4:
> >
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:04 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> The following packages should also work with python2.5 after a round of
> binNMUs, as some dependencies were relaxed in python-support 0.7.4:
> dia
> exaile
> k3d
You can add:
mod-wsgi
which in
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 21:21 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> Well, then, that's not going to happen before the toolchain gets fixed
> on mips, because of
>
> > Here is the list:
> (...)
> > xulrunner
Well, I don't think this transition will be done in a day. If, by the
time that is
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:42 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>> You have missed Zope.
>> It is not possible to run Zope 2.X with Python 2.5 yet, same for Zope 3.
>> The problems in there are nothing a maintainer could fix, except
>> somebody is willing to pay several
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:04:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Please note that they can all be binNMUed after python2.5 has become the
> default, but all of them will have to migrate to testing at once. We
> must make this list shorter unless we want this transition to recall bad
> memories t
Le vendredi 05 octobre 2007 à 20:42 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> You have missed Zope.
> It is not possible to run Zope 2.X with Python 2.5 yet, same for Zope 3.
> The problems in there are nothing a maintainer could fix, except
> somebody is willing to pay several days (weeks!?) of work.
> Cha
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:04:27PM +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have conducted a thorough analysis of all packages preventing us from
> migrating to python 2.5.
Thanks a lot for the work !
> Now, for the bad news. The following packages have various kinds of
> issues that preven
>>> Please note that they can all be binNMUed after python2.5 has become the
>>> default, but all of them will have to migrate to testing at once. We
>>> must make this list shorter unless we want this transition to recall bad
>>> memories to the release team.
>>> mod-wsgi
>> It's not pos
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:42:46PM +, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Now, for the bad news. The following packages have various kinds of
> > issues that prevent them from working with python2.5. Some of them are
> > trivial, some are much more tricky. In all cases, we need to focus on
> > th
Hi,
> Now, for the bad news. The following packages have various kinds of
> issues that prevent them from working with python2.5. Some of them are
> trivial, some are much more tricky. In all cases, we need to focus on
> these bugs if we want to see those packages in lenny:
You have missed Zope.
Hi,
I have conducted a thorough analysis of all packages preventing us from
migrating to python 2.5.
I cannot say that the situation looks good. Since the last transition,
many new packages have been introduced, and a large part of them don't
support the current policy. Another bad news is that i
25 matches
Mail list logo
