* Ben Carrillo , 2013-01-29, 20:02:
[1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-srp
Now I had a look at this one, too.
Implementation of the _ctsrp module is flawed: you must not load a
shared library via the .so symlink. The symlink is supposed to be used
at build-time one. As far I can s
> So... Have you talked with python-pbs maintainer about this? One could think
> that you're trying to hijack the package under the guise of upstream rename.
> I hope this is not the case!
Ouch! Thanks for pointing this out. No I had not, I had naively assumed a new
package name implied a complete
* Ben Carrillo , 2013-01-29, 20:02:
[0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-sh
I had a quick look at this one.
So... Have you talked with python-pbs maintainer about this? One could
think that you're trying to hijack the package under the guise of
upstream rename. I hope this is not th
Hi all!
I have just finished (my first) two debian packages: python-sh and
python-srp. [0][1]
I uploaded them to mentors and got a sponsor. He already reviewed
python-sh [2], and will be looking at python-srp soon.
I thought I would bring the packages to the team if there are no
objections, and
4 matches
Mail list logo
