Status of sqlalchemy

Hi, we have quite some Python3.12 related bugs caused by sqlalchemy which seem to be fixed in experimental (which is lagging behind upstream 2.0.27 as well as version 1.4 in unstable where upstream just released 1.4.51). It seems the issue that leads to bug #1058265 > File "/usr/lib/python3/

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

Hi, are there any news regarding the status of sqlalchemy? I'm curious, because the next version of gajim will depend on sqlalchemy >= 2, which is only in experimental right now. Cheers

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

On 4/14/24 23:23, Martin wrote: Hi, are there any news regarding the status of sqlalchemy? I'm curious, because the next version of gajim will depend on sqlalchemy >= 2, which is only in experimental right now. Cheers Hi, As much as I know, Piotr has been nicely putting this on o

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

Le lun. 15 avr. 2024 à 11:20, Thomas Goirand a écrit : > The rest of: > - pymodbus > > I don't even know what they do. Life is better when one does not have to deal with modbus :-) This package is outdated and need a refresh. > All that to say: I'm ok at this point if SQLA 2.x is uploaded to Sid

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

Quoting Thomas Goirand : The rest of: - pymodbus - sqlalchemy-utc - wtforms-alchemy I don't even know what they do. All that to say: I'm ok at this point if SQLA 2.x is uploaded to Sid and we move on... I'll check, if I can update pymodbus, which is some versions behind upstream. Maybe that

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

sqlalchemy 2.X currently FTBFS due to a segmentation fault (3.11 and 3.12) somewhere in pysqlite: […] test/orm/inheritance/test_assorted_poly.py::MultiOfTypeContainsEagerTest_joined::test_big_query[not_use_criteria-contains_eager] PASSED

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

On 4/15/24 12:04, Martin wrote: If nobody objects (or is faster than me), I'll upload SQLAlchemy 2.x to unstable in a couple of days or weeks. No hurry from my side. Cheers Please don't do this alone. Ask Piotr, as he's been the usual maintainer of the package. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

Quoting Piotr Ożarowski : sqlalchemy 2.X currently FTBFS due to a segmentation fault (3.11 and 3.12) somewhere in pysqlite: ... I will upload to unstable once I figure that one out Perfect! I prefer not to mess with the package, if I don't have to ;-) Thanks, Piotr!

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

Hi, Am 15.04.24 um 11:20 schrieb Thomas Goirand: The rest of: ... - wtforms-alchemy I'll try to have a look at this library. -- Regards Carsten

Re: Status of sqlalchemy

Hi Piotr, On 2024-04-15 15:07, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > sqlalchemy 2.X currently FTBFS due to a segmentation fault (3.11 and > 3.12) somewhere in pysqlite: ... > I will upload to unstable once I figure that one out Any news on that? Thank you! (I'm not sure, if I can help with that, unfortunately

Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

On 2024-04-15 11:38, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > Le lun. 15 avr. 2024 à 11:20, Thomas Goirand a écrit : >> The rest of: >> - pymodbus >> >> I don't even know what they do. > > Life is better when one does not have to deal with modbus :-) Yes! > This package is outdated and need a refresh. As I s

Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

Hi, I ll check back home, but it's most likely I was waiting for SQLAlchemy 2.xx. I know for share that one package does wait for SA 2.xx but can t remember which one. > It looks like all but one of the debian/patches are obsolete now? Sure Le lun. 22 avr. 2024, 08:09, Martin a écrit : > On

Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

Quoting Alexandre Detiste : I ll check back home, but it's most likely I was waiting for SQLAlchemy 2.xx. Good! I know for share that one package does wait for SA 2.xx but can t remember which one. It looksk like all but one of the debian/patches are obsolete now? It seems, that *two* pa

Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

Le lun. 22 avr. 2024, 09:57, Martin a écrit : > > 1. privacy-breach-fixes.patch (I updated this, can push > These ones are annoying to maintain. I wish dh_installdocs would be smart enough to strip these tiny widget that are present in so many Readme.md on GitHub. They re quite formulaic and it

Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

Hi Alexandre, I pushed my changes to debian/master. If you have time to work on pymodbus (e.g. update disable-failing-unittests.patch), please go on. I probably can't work on that this week. Cheers

Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

helper.py is not so helpful (and not even used in test/conftest.py ?) anyway it builds now but maybe upstream would accept a patch to help reduce the downstream patch (maybe read certificates location from env variable, this needs more eyes) It's almost done. Greetings Le mar. 23 avr. 2024 à 00

Re: Status of pymodbus (was: Status of sqlalchemy)

Hi, I finally got it working here ! For a very short time. Then it breaks again with today's new Pytest. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pymodbus/-/jobs/5780102 -> "test" branch. https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12269 It needs a new pytest-asyncio ... https://tracker.d