Hi Elena,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:41:41 +0100
Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> Yes, please, a merge request would help: I've looked into it a few
> times already and wasn't able to finish it in the time I had.
>
> But since it's going into experimental, wouldn't it be better to
> package the lates
On 2021-02-24 at 18:53:19 +0100, Lorenz Schori wrote:
> > Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some
> > improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is
> > viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that
> > upstream changed to proxmoxer/prox
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 17:50:43 +0100
Lorenz Schori wrote:
> Version 1.0.4 has some small fixes for the ssh backend and some
> improvements for the http backend. Nothing major though. If it is
> viable to include that in bullseye, then why not. Also note that
> upstream changed to proxmoxer/pro
Hi Elena,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:37:54 +0100
Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> [...]
> Have you already checked how significant the difference is? I suspect
> that the delta would be too much to be reasonable even under the
> current freeze rules (and Prometheus PVE Exporter as a new package
> woul
On 2021-02-21 at 12:50:16 +0100, Lorenz Schori wrote:
> I am the author of Prometheus PVE Exporter[1]. I recently discovered
> that there is only one somewhat exotic dependency left (proxmoxer[2])
> which needs some love before Prometheus PVE Exporter itself could be
> packaged for Debian. I'd like
5 matches
Mail list logo
