Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-25 Thread Matthias Klose
On 23.10.2010 13:26, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Fr, 2010-10-22 at 14:18 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Tell that the Arch people: http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/ Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fr, 2010-10-22 at 14:18 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > >Tell that the Arch people: > >http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/ > > > >Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X > > I heard that Gentoo has done i

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >Tell that the Arch people: >http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/ > >Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X I heard that Gentoo has done it too, but I have not verified that. -Barry signature.asc Descripti

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 18, 2010, at 05:33 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote: >If you mean “port all the scripts and applications of the default >installation from python to python3”, then that’s a goal that could be >achieved for wheezy. Especially if we work with other Python porters: http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mo, 2010-10-18 at 17:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 15:21 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : > > That's overly pessimistic. I'm on the other end of extreme: Wheezy CAN > > release with Py3k as default version. There's a lot of porting efforts > > going on, and

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 15:21 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit : > That's overly pessimistic. I'm on the other end of extreme: Wheezy CAN > release with Py3k as default version. There's a lot of porting efforts > going on, and Debian would be heroic to be one of the long term > releases (earl

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-18 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 21:19, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places, >> but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well] >> >> I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Py

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-16 Thread Asheesh Laroia
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: I'm wondering if we really need a dh_pysupport wrapper or if we should just fix the packages instead. And easier transition would be to provide dh_pycentral and ph_pysupport wrappers which just do the right thing, together with a lintian error telling

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places, > but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well] > > I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy. > > Python 2.7 is the last version

Re: Wheezy plans

2010-10-16 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 10/15/2010 11:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places, > but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well] > > I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy. Full ack. > [...] > I want the next transition t

Wheezy plans

2010-10-15 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places, but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well] I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy. Python 2.7 is the last version from 2.X series and Python 2.8 will never be released upstream. Python 3.X