On 23.10.2010 13:26, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Fr, 2010-10-22 at 14:18 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Tell that the Arch people:
http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/
Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X
On Fr, 2010-10-22 at 14:18 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
> >Tell that the Arch people:
> >http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/
> >
> >Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X
>
> I heard that Gentoo has done i
On Oct 22, 2010, at 07:52 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>Tell that the Arch people:
>http://www.archlinux.org/news/python-is-now-python-3/
>
>Yep, they switched /usr/bin/python to Python 3.X
I heard that Gentoo has done it too, but I have not verified that.
-Barry
signature.asc
Descripti
On Oct 18, 2010, at 05:33 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>If you mean “port all the scripts and applications of the default
>installation from python to python3”, then that’s a goal that could be
>achieved for wheezy.
Especially if we work with other Python porters:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/l
On Mo, 2010-10-18 at 17:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 15:21 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> > That's overly pessimistic. I'm on the other end of extreme: Wheezy CAN
> > release with Py3k as default version. There's a lot of porting efforts
> > going on, and
Le lundi 18 octobre 2010 à 15:21 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> That's overly pessimistic. I'm on the other end of extreme: Wheezy CAN
> release with Py3k as default version. There's a lot of porting efforts
> going on, and Debian would be heroic to be one of the long term
> releases (earl
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 21:19, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>> FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places,
>> but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well]
>>
>> I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Py
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
I'm wondering if we really need a dh_pysupport wrapper or if we should
just fix the packages instead. And easier transition would be to provide
dh_pycentral and ph_pysupport wrappers which just do the right thing,
together with a lintian error telling
On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:45:24 pm Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places,
> but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well]
>
> I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy.
>
> Python 2.7 is the last version
On 10/15/2010 11:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places,
> but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well]
>
> I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy.
Full ack.
> [...]
> I want the next transition t
FYI: [I already mentioned that on #debian-python and in other places,
but it deserves a mail to debian-python as well]
I think that we should support Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 only in Wheezy.
Python 2.7 is the last version from 2.X series and Python 2.8 will never
be released upstream. Python 3.X
11 matches
Mail list logo