On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:15:43AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> I was under the impression that the ‘#debian-python’ channel was a
> resource for use equally by anyone for discussion of maintaining Python
> packages in Debian. When did it become an in-group-versus-out-group club
> house, with credent
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 14:15, Ben Finney wrote:
> Sandro Tosi writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:08, Ben Finney wrote:
>> > Tristan Seligmann writes:
>> >
>> >> Are you even in the channel?
>> >
>> > Often, yes.
>>
>> Let the people (sponsoree & sponsors) who use that "tracker" decide
>>
Sandro Tosi writes:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:08, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Tristan Seligmann writes:
> >
> >> Are you even in the channel?
> >
> > Often, yes.
>
> Let the people (sponsoree & sponsors) who use that "tracker" decide
> what to use for it (you decided to not maintain your packages
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 03:08, Ben Finney wrote:
> Tristan Seligmann writes:
>
>> Are you even in the channel?
>
> Often, yes.
>
>> The topic of the channel seems like a perfectly reasonable place for
>> this kind of list, too, so I'm not sure why you object to it so
>> strongly.
>
> I would thin
> Elliot Murphy writes:
>
>> It's rather obnoxious to assume I didn't communicate as an individual
>> asking for assistance. When I did that, jwilk told me to add the
>> package to the list of packages in the topic waiting to be reviewed,
>> as is the standard operating procedure for the DPMT. It'
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> I would think a separate task tracker would be more appropriate; the
> channel topic should remain primarily descriptive of the topic of the
> channel, after all.
I'd strongly suggest the use of PET (package entropy tracker) written
by the Pe
Elliot Murphy writes:
> It's rather obnoxious to assume I didn't communicate as an individual
> asking for assistance. When I did that, jwilk told me to add the
> package to the list of packages in the topic waiting to be reviewed,
> as is the standard operating procedure for the DPMT. It's also
Tristan Seligmann writes:
> Are you even in the channel?
Often, yes.
> The topic of the channel seems like a perfectly reasonable place for
> this kind of list, too, so I'm not sure why you object to it so
> strongly.
I would think a separate task tracker would be more appropriate; the
channel
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Elliot Murphy writes:
>
>> I've added foolscap to the /topic in #debian-python
>
> That strikes me as a rather obnoxious thing to do. Why change the topic
> for the whole channel, rather than just communicating as an individual
> asking for ass
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> That strikes me as a rather obnoxious thing to do. Why change the topic
> for the whole channel, rather than just communicating as an individual
> asking for assistance?
It's rather obnoxious to assume I didn't communicate as an individual
aski
Elliot Murphy writes:
> I've added foolscap to the /topic in #debian-python
That strikes me as a rather obnoxious thing to do. Why change the topic
for the whole channel, rather than just communicating as an individual
asking for assistance?
> but I didn't know where to say about the testing th
Hi!
Zooko (the upstream developer) filed #567145 asking for
python-foolscap to be updated to the new 0.5.0 release.
I have committed a new changelog entry for this, test built and
installed a package using svn-buildpackage after running
get-orig-source to obtain a correctly modified tarball, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
