On Friday 16 September 2011 17:20:45 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> #7!
I like #7 too.
--
Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol'
http://mornie.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.d
On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>Long story short -- we can't use any of the 1-5 logos. Indeed leaving us
>with #6 and #7 -- please vote!
#7!
-Barry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
ah evil you Adam -- quoted public the honorable PSF committee
email without their explicit consent! ;-)
Long story short -- we can't use any of the 1-5 logos. Indeed leaving us
with #6 and #7 -- please vote!
I will drop a question to debian-legal (and Zack CCed) about use
of openlogo -- just to m
Paul Wise , Yaroslav
Halchenko
Cc: David Mertz , psf-trademarks
Betreff: Re: [psf-trademarks] [PSF-Board] may be a logo?
> Dear Debian developers/designers,
>
> Unfortunately, after discussing it on the Python Software Foundation
> Trademarks Committee, our unanimous opinion is that
Somehow I have missed this one (probably it never reached the list due
to attachment size?) so I went ahead and cooked that one up -- it is the
last in the chain now (I kinda like it too; not sure if tongue is
necessary and what color to make it then):
http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/pydebian-red_tu
Adam wrote:
> Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>>> Do we have a logo for our Python-In-Debian effort(s) (was needing one
>>> for a recent talk but failed to deliver in time)? What about
>>> having one? I am not a designer and possibly lacking any t
On Sep 15, 2011, at 01:03 PM, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
>Maybe the best thing to do is contacting the PSF.
Already done!
-Barry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.d
On Thursday 15 September 2011 06:49:02 Paul Wise wrote:
> I wonder if that is an allowed use of the Python trademark though.
Quoting from PSF Trademark Usage Policy¹ for derived logos:
Derived logos must always be sufficiently different from the Python logos
to allow the community to tell
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Do we have a logo for our Python-In-Debian effort(s) (was needing one
> for a recent talk but failed to deliver in time)? What about
> having one? I am not a designer and possibly lacking any taste, so
> please do not judge wildly. Wh
2011/9/14 Yaroslav Halchenko
> Hi Everyone Alike,
>
> Do we have a logo for our Python-In-Debian effort(s) (was needing one
> for a recent talk but failed to deliver in time)? What about
> having one? I am not a designer and possibly lacking any taste, so
> please do not judge wildly. What woul
Yaroslav Halchenko
writes:
> What would be your choice among the following 6:
>
> http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/pydebian-red_tuned/
I think 4 is good, though I'm not sure of the number since it doesn't
seem to be lined up. I mean
http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/pydebian-red_tuned/pydebian-3_p
On Sep 14, 2011, at 03:41 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>Do we have a logo for our Python-In-Debian effort(s) (was needing one
>for a recent talk but failed to deliver in time)? What about
>having one? I am not a designer and possibly lacking any taste, so
>please do not judge wildly. What woul
On Sep 14, 2011 9:41 PM, "Yaroslav Halchenko" wrote:
> What would be your choice among the
> following 6:
>
> http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/pydebian-red_tuned/
My favorite is 2.
Michael
Hi Everyone Alike,
Do we have a logo for our Python-In-Debian effort(s) (was needing one
for a recent talk but failed to deliver in time)? What about
having one? I am not a designer and possibly lacking any taste, so
please do not judge wildly. What would be your choice among the
following 6:
14 matches
Mail list logo
