Re: s/-setuptools/-pkg-resources/ dependency : also in upstream EGGs?

2009-09-14 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Stefano Zacchiroli, 2009-09-14] > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:00:43AM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > it's safe to remove requires.txt from binary package (not the whole > > Egg-info, it can contain important data, f.e. entry points) > > Uhm, please expand on "it's safe". If you have all the de

Re: s/-setuptools/-pkg-resources/ dependency : also in upstream EGGs?

2009-09-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 02:00:43AM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > it's safe to remove requires.txt from binary package (not the whole > Egg-info, it can contain important data, f.e. entry points) Uhm, please expand on "it's safe". I've seen in the past EGG loading due to unsatisfied dependencies

Re: s/-setuptools/-pkg-resources/ dependency : also in upstream EGGs?

2009-09-13 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Stefano Zacchiroli, 2009-09-13] > [ Please Cc:-me on replies directed only to -python, > I'm not subscribed ] [...] > I presume you are trying to make "less needed" python-setuptools at > runtime. Still, packages like this one (but I presume various others) do > have setuptools in their "require

s/-setuptools/-pkg-resources/ dependency : also in upstream EGGs?

2009-09-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
[ Please Cc:-me on replies directed only to -python, I'm not subscribed ] On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:16:51AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > python-pkg-resources is packaged as a separate package; usually only > the pkg_resources module is needed as a runtime dependency. > please depend on python