On 10/16/2015 11:53 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> (it still clearly states we use SVN only, though!)
since you have already mentioned this a few times: how about changing
the policy then, to clearly state that we use GIT only?
as you haven't done that yet, i guess there is some catch; but since i
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2015-10-07]
> [Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-07]
> > * Team in Maintainers is a strong statement that fully collaborative
> > maintenance is preferred. Anyone can commit to the vcs and upload as
> > needed. A courtesy email to Uploaders can be nice but not required.
> >
> > * Team
On Oct 07, 2015, at 04:08 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>I meant to use your exact words, see attachment
+1 !
Cheers,
-Barry
[Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-07]
> >how about making it official and adding it to the policy?
>
> I thought you had volunteered to do that (with native speaker review)? I
> previously mistakenly remembered Scott volunteering for that.
>
> If not, I'm happy to do it.
I meant to use your exact words, s
On Oct 07, 2015, at 03:29 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-07]
>> * Team in Maintainers is a strong statement that fully collaborative
>> maintenance is preferred. Anyone can commit to the vcs and upload as
>> needed. A courtesy email to Uploaders can be nice but not requir
Quoting Piotr Ożarowski :
[Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-07]
* Team in Maintainers is a strong statement that fully collaborative
maintenance is preferred. Anyone can commit to the vcs and upload as
needed. A courtesy email to Uploaders can be nice but not required.
* Team in Uploaders is a weak
[Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-07]
> * Team in Maintainers is a strong statement that fully collaborative
> maintenance is preferred. Anyone can commit to the vcs and upload as
> needed. A courtesy email to Uploaders can be nice but not required.
>
> * Team in Uploaders is a weak statement of collab
On Oct 07, 2015, at 02:33 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
>Quoting Piotr Ożarowski :
>> I assume you all like other ideas, like no team in Maintainer, right?
>
>To me, "team maintenance" would mean, that the team appears in the
>"Maintainer" field. In "Uploaders" it doesn't make sense, so where
>woul
Quoting Piotr Ożarowski :
I assume you all like other ideas, like no team in Maintainer, right?
To me, "team maintenance" would mean, that the team appears in the
"Maintainer" field. In "Uploaders" it doesn't make sense, so where
would the team appear?
Personally, I prefer to have the team in
9 matches
Mail list logo
