Re: Team upload for python-jedi

2017-01-22 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Ghislain, On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:54:13AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > "Drop DPMT from Uploaders (due to problems with multiple tarballs in > git-dpm)" > > Then, the package is no longer team-maintained? Personally I think we could allow such packages to remain in team, even if they ar

Re: Call for testing: Sphinx 1.5

2017-01-22 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 06:04:00PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > With some delay (usual for me), Sphinx 1.5 is now available in experimental. > > [...] > > If everything goes well, I want to have Sphinx 1.5 included in Stretch. After all, it looks like 1.5 will *not* be in Stretch (unless someon

RFS: humanfriendly/2.3.2-1

2017-01-22 Thread Gaurav Juvekar
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "humanfriendly" * Package name: humanfriendly Version : 2.3.2-1 Upstream Author : Peter Odding * URL : https://humanfriendly.readthedocs.io * License : E

Team maintained packages and git-dpm (was Re: Team upload for python-jedi)

2017-01-22 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 22, 2017, at 03:00 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:54:13AM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >> "Drop DPMT from Uploaders (due to problems with multiple tarballs in >> git-dpm)" >> >> Then, the package is no longer team-maintained? > >Personally I think we could allow

Re: Team maintained packages and git-dpm (was Re: Team upload for python-jedi)

2017-01-22 Thread Brian May
Barry Warsaw writes: > We've talked about eventually dropping git-dpm and just using gbp (with gbp-pq > for patch management). There are some packages (I won't mention names) that have already started doing this. Would it be worth creating a concrete proposal to phase out usage of git-dpm in fa

Re: Team maintained packages and git-dpm (was Re: Team upload for python-jedi)

2017-01-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Jan 23 2017, Brian May wrote: [ Convert from git-dpm to gbp ] > Or would dgit be a better option? I confuse I don't really understand > dgit. dgit can be used with both git-dpm and gbp. Moving to dgit-only would mean to use a single-debian-patch. Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encrypted emails pref

Re: Team maintained packages and git-dpm (was Re: Team upload for python-jedi)

2017-01-22 Thread Nikolaus Rath
On Jan 23 2017, Brian May wrote: > I don't particular care what we move to, however it seems to me that we > really should be dropping git-dpm. I think git-dpm works very nice as long as the package doesn't get too complex. I think it would be overreaction to convert all packages, just because gi

Re: Team maintained packages and git-dpm (was Re: Team upload for python-jedi)

2017-01-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On January 22, 2017 8:11:26 PM EST, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >On Jan 23 2017, Brian May wrote: >[ Convert from git-dpm to gbp ] >> Or would dgit be a better option? I confuse I don't really understand >> dgit. > >dgit can be used with both git-dpm and gbp. Moving to dgit-only would >mean to use a s