Hi Timo,
Am Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 04:08:51PM +0100 schrieb Timo Röhling:
> I guess the motivation behind the weak collaboration model is that some
> packages have hidden "gotchas", which a casual team uploader might not know.
> For instance, pygit2 is one of multiple libgit2 language bindings
Hi Scott,
Am Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:54:01PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> It's self-induced. I mean if it's demotivating to have people point out that
> you didn't follow the policy, then you can solve that all by yourself by
> following the policy. If I take your argument to its logical
Hi Andreas (2024.02.27_08:05:44_+)
> I did what I usually do in those teams: I dedicated quite some time in
> team wide bug hunting. That way I squashed about 50 bugs on packages
> where I was not in Uploaders.
Thank you for doing this work. I've come across a number of DPT bugs
where
On February 27, 2024 11:42:33 PM UTC, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>On 2/27/24 19:32, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I suspect that packages will be removed from team maintenance as a result
>> though and I think that's a bad idea.
>
>If a package isn't in the team, any DD can ask for permission from the
On 2/27/24 19:32, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I suspect that packages will be removed from team maintenance as a result
though and I think that's a bad idea.
If a package isn't in the team, any DD can ask for permission from the
maintainer before an upload. So, what's the difference, with a
On 2024-02-27 03:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packages
from the Blends teams to DPT. I was
Andreas Tille writes:
> Since I consider the current situation as demotivating for newcomers
> as well as long standing contributors I would like to suggest to drop
> this "weak statement of collaboration" option from policy. I've attached
> an according patch to the team policy[5]. I'm fine
Good day,
As I met "pollo" this morning on OFTC after inquiring about helping out
with the adoption of virtualenvwrapper or researching more into the state
of packaging pyenv in Debian, he suggested a good starting point would be
to read https://deb.li/PyPolicy which I had not until now and then
On February 27, 2024 2:27:35 PM UTC, Scott Talbert wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
>>> the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science
Hi Carles (2024.02.26_00:00:48_+)
> The first one includes, in top_level.txt:
> debian
> ping3
>
> And the second one:
> build
> debian
> ping3
>
> Where "ping3" is the expected module. "debian" is there because of the
> debian/ directory (I'm super sure, and AFAIK should not be there!) and
While perfectly understanding the weak collaboration model reasoning, I've
still always found DPT as uploader and not maintainer rather absurd TBH. The
current go to tool (as I understand it) for python packaging, py2dsp, also
creates an initial packaging with team in uploaders section and the
On 2024-02-27 15:15, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Though indeed, I don't
> think it's reasonable to have a package in the team, but with strong
> ownership. I believe that we should either have a package in the team,
> or not. Period.
I'm in favour of that change, too, but I can live with the current
Hi,
* Andreas Tille [2024-02-27 09:05]:
Since I consider the current situation as demotivating for
newcomers as well as long standing contributors I would like to
suggest to drop this "weak statement of collaboration" option from
policy.
+1 from me.
I guess the motivation behind the weak
* Thomas Goirand [2024-02-27 15:15]:
So I'm 100% with you for the removal of this policy.
+1 to everything.
Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30
On 2/27/24 09:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packages
from the Blends teams to DPT. I was
Hi,
I became more deeply involved into DPT since 2022 as a consequence of
the suggestion for transfering several Debian Med/Science packages to
DPMT[1][2]. I happily followed this suggestion and moved >30 packages
from the Blends teams to DPT. I was happy with this move since it makes
sense.
17 matches
Mail list logo
