Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-04-27 Thread Christian Kurz
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 03:45:59PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > > Maybe we should limit this to bugs older than x month and I would > > > > suggest x=3. > > > > > Well, if a maintainer doesn't close old bugs on his packages, he > > > should first be w

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-04-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Apr 27, 1999 at 03:45:59PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > Maybe we should limit this to bugs older than x month and I would > > > suggest x=3. > > > Well, if a maintainer doesn't close old bugs on his packages, he > > should first be warned to do so. Of course, pointers on how to > >

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-04-27 Thread Christian Kurz
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > So I would like to ask, if the members of the QA-Team should have the > > right to close bug-reports if they are fixed or they fix them? > They now have the right to close those against orp

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-04-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > So I would like to ask, if the members of the QA-Team should have the > right to close bug-reports if they are fixed or they fix them? They now have the right to close those against orphaned packages, and mark 'fixed' those against

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-04-27 Thread Christian Kurz
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > So I would like to ask, if the members of the QA-Team should have the > > right to close bug-reports if they are fixed or they fix them? Maybe we > > should limit this to bugs old

Re: QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-04-27 Thread Christian Kurz
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address > to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on > -devel so I think it would be a good thing because Maybe this isn't a bad idea, as your goal is to improve

QA responsible for help in fixing bugs?

1999-04-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
Hi again Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on -devel so I think it would be a good thing because a) This messages often stay unanswered on -devel and b) we have the people with the knowledge to

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group

1999-04-27 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > So I would like to ask, if the members of the QA-Team should have the > right to close bug-reports if they are fixed or they fix them? Maybe we > should limit this to bugs older than x month and I would suggest x=3. > What do the o