Re: Quality Assurance in Debian

1999-09-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 04:30:45PM +, David Coe écrivait: > Let's do it. How can I help? I agree we shouldn't have to vote on this; Actually what I need is a much better main page for the QA web site : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/qa/ I need a text explaining how people can work for deb

Re: Quality Assurance in Debian

1999-09-13 Thread David Coe
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The web site can be easily updated by sending mails to 2 mailbots. The > committee only can create new tasks but everybody can update the > information available for each task (setting the task as 'patch > available', closing it, setting the status fie

Re: Patch for bash

1999-09-13 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 05:13:55AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > So Guy, would you be willing to apply this patch? Unfortunately, I don't > seem to be able to compile bash properly (the libc5 stuff dies horrible > deaths if I don't comment it out), so I can't offer to make an NMU, but > hopefully s

Quality Assurance in Debian

1999-09-13 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, I didn't want to announce this today but since Joey has brought up a hot topic on -devel this morning, I feel that it's time to make public what some people (me, Christian Kurz, Tortsten Landschoff, Josip Rodin, Vincent Renardias and Martin "Joey" Schulze) have prepared for resurrecting debia

NOT done!

1999-09-13 Thread Lazarus Long
WHY is this bug marked "done"??? There is NO explanation, nor has the problem been fixed! Please explain! > Subject: Bug#42295: marked as done (console-apt: Suggests, Recommends, > Depends, Provides ...) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <[E