Hi Wichert,
I'm wondering about your bug report because the "make distclean" in the
clean target of ntop does remove config.cache & friends. The only problem
I can see is if you abort the build process while configure runs: There's
no Makefile so "make distclean" fails, but config.cache & friends
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 22:13:19 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line These bugs are already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:50:35 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line There's already a libfnlib-dev package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi,
I will do uploads for the following packages to fix some bugs:
9menu
chimera
cthugha
cucipop
fnlib
ntop
tclx8.0.4
xabacus
xtrojka
Please tell me if someone else wants to make an upload for one or
more of these packages instead.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is bett
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 69363 fixed
Bug#69363: FWD: Realplayer 7 (final) released
Severity set to `fixed'.
> severity 70537 fixed
Bug#70537: dselect description should mention which archive to fetch
Severity set to `fixed'.
> severity 71097 fixed
Bug#71097: realplay
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:05:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Hm, I found out why I didn't have any problems: The German pages let
> > you still download the old version...
> >
> > Argl!
> >
> > That means you get different versions dependant o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 65511
Bug#65511: realplayer won't install (no space left on device)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:05:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hm, I found out why I didn't have any problems: The German pages let
> you still download the old version...
>
> Argl!
>
> That means you get different versions dependant on the "preferred
> language" setting in your browser.
*urgl
> Hm, I found out why I didn't have any problems: The German pages let
> you still download the old version...
uhm, so I'm sorry, I should've filled a bugreport for real.com :)
> That means you get different versions dependant on the "preferred
> language" setting in your browser.
that's very st
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>...
> and then - it's new version with new name (csth instead of b2) so you have
> to rename rpm to what installer expects, and that's a hack.
>...
Hm, I found out why I didn't have any problems: The German pages let
you still download the old version
Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:24:18 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Hi,
I tried to download the Realplayer RPM and I had no problem with
downloading and installing it. If you can't explain what exactly your
problem is I tend to close this bug.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or wh
27 matches
Mail list logo
