On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I want to suggest to change the way NM works.
>
> Currently, someone applies at [1] and if he's lucky he has his account
> less than 2 months after he applied.
what real benefit is there in erecting even more barriers-to-entry for
pro
[Hey, I didn't Cc you, why do you Cc me know? I read -qa and -project,
so I don't really need three copies of this mail.]
On 00-12-17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Well, what you propose here is an an removal of a debian developer and I
> > don't think this sh
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 03:42:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I've seen these not yet used guidelines for taking over packages and I
Those guidelines have been used at least once.
--
Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~bro
On Sunday 17 December 2000 12:09, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 00-12-17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > >...
> > >
> > > > > > suggests to the NM team that he should become a Debian account.
> > > > > > The NM team (perhaps the current NM-Committee plus other
> >
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Well, what you propose here is an an removal of a debian developer and I
> don't think this should be so easy as you describe it. We should be able
> to have a checklist and if some checks fail delete his debian account.
> If someone is really MIA and w
Matthew Vernon writes:
>I'm working on these now...
Well, I've got a built version with the currently-open bugs fixed;
OTOH, the code is terrible; I'm not sure I've got the patience to go
and try and fix up the grossnesses in it. Shall I upload the bug-fix
packages?
Matthew
--
Rapun.sel -
On 00-12-17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Cord Beermann wrote:
> > >No, I don't intend to change this. My point is: Someone who has a Debian
> > >account can do much harm (intentional or accidential). That's a reason why
> > >I think we should have a severe look at the work of an applic
On 00-12-17 Colin Watson wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >> more careful task&skill test would be helpful.
> >
> >Yes, and the main point of my proposal is: An applicant doesn't get his
> >account before he had worked some months for D
On 00-12-17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> >...
> > > > > suggests to the NM team that he should become a Debian account. The NM
> > > > > team (perhaps the current NM-Committee plus other interested Debian
> > > > > developers) then looks critical at the work of
On 17 Dec 2000, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
>...
> without being a maintainer" and everything comes to a halt. The
> goals I stated for joining Debian includes: work on the Chinese
> translation of w.d.o and help with QA work for Chinese-specific
> packages. Okay, enough for background information...
On Sunday 17 December 2000 07:40, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Perhaps we need a more organized system of sponsorship, so that people
> > who are stuck waiting in the NM queue can do QA work with some degree of
> > ease. At the moment it seems to be largely a matter of whether yo
Colin Watson wrote:
> Perhaps we need a more organized system of sponsorship, so that people
> who are stuck waiting in the NM queue can do QA work with some degree of
> ease. At the moment it seems to be largely a matter of whether you're
> lucky enough to find somebody who'll quickly and consiste
12 matches
Mail list logo
