On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:55:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> > 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
>
> No objections, a couple of suggestions that you're
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
No objections, a couple of suggestions that you're welcome to ignore:
* consider tagging packages with legal issues
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
Please be sure to cc whoever ITPed the package (not always the
submitter).
> xscrabble #91883, f
Hi Martin!
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020114 20:01]:
> > Hmm... it appears I did NOT receive a lot of the email in that bug.
> > Argh, I hate when the BTS does that!
>
> Of course you didn'
Hi Bas,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> mosml#111560, filed: 129, changed 129
I can't believe it. This was the software I ITP'ed when I joined Debian.
It is actually quite nice but it uses GPL parts and links non-free
parts to i
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
I would propose the two-stage method in use for ITAs:
For each apparently stale ITP:
1) If the last thing that happened in the bug is a QA qu
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This problem with WNPP should be solved when people can subscribe to
> individual bugs.
Well, except that it really would be solved when that feature exists
*and* the "relevant" people are auto-subbed to particular wnpp bugs.
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020114 20:01]:
> Hmm... it appears I did NOT receive a lot of the email in that bug.
> Argh, I hate when the BTS does that!
Of course you didn't. The owner of the wnpp pseudo package is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the bug submitt
* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020114 22:36]:
> The bugs that will be renamed are approximately (my local bts mirror is
> a few days out of date) the following: (the filed and changed numbers
> are the dates of opening and last change of the bug, in days before today)
>
> The following ITP'
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
[...]
> cyrus2-imapd #108942, filed: 151, changed 151
Don't touch this one, it is not dead yet :-)
I have been packaging beta versions, and the bug tells the users where to
get them. Currentl
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apache2 #103471, filed: 194, changed 194
Not this one. Daniel and Thom are working on this.
> gnue-common #104417, filed: 186, changed 186
> gnue-designer#104418, filed
Hi guys!
I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
The bugs that will be renamed are approximately (my local bts mirror is
a few days out of date) the following: (the filed and changed numbers
are the dates of opening and last change
we are the World's Largest distributor of
direct company news and other business communications materials.
we can broadcast your web site news or your
business, or a new service within your business ( you can add your logo/photo to
your press release ) to every Newspaper, Magazine, Televisio
Title: 검색엔진 아이따따따
Le Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:13:28PM +, Colin Watson écrivait:
> QA is something the project should be talking about, partly to help get
> new people interested and generally improve and speed up QA, and partly
> because seeing progress is a good way to improve morale (at least I know
> it's good
15 matches
Mail list logo
