Re: gtk-doc-tools and #196073

2003-06-25 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:53:58 +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > you uploaded a new version of gtk-doc the 2003-06-19 (maintainer: > debian-qa) to fix a few bugs, but you forgot the #196073 one, which were > marked pending by the maintainer before orphaning, and not fixed. I didn't forget it. I was

Re: Bug#117561: Proposition of solution to this problem [about doc-rfc]

2003-06-25 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 10:42:23AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > Kai, I don't understand you at all and you don't answer the private mails > sent to you, so I'm gonna abuse this bug repport to try to discuss with you. > [with a CC on debian-qa so that other people can jump into the discussion] >

gtk-doc-tools and #196073

2003-06-25 Thread Martin Quinson
Hello, you uploaded a new version of gtk-doc the 2003-06-19 (maintainer: debian-qa) to fix a few bugs, but you forgot the #196073 one, which were marked pending by the maintainer before orphaning, and not fixed. Could you please reupload this package with the needed dependency ? Thanks, Mt. --

Re: Bug#117561: Proposition of solution to this problem [about doc-rfc]

2003-06-25 Thread Martin Quinson
Kai, I don't understand you at all and you don't answer the private mails sent to you, so I'm gonna abuse this bug repport to try to discuss with you. [with a CC on debian-qa so that other people can jump into the discussion] You packaged the RFCs, which are a very important piece of informations,