I want to supply a patch to #202416 (developers-reference: mention QA in NMU
section). So I hunted around to find the list of best practices for QA
uploads that I could base my update on. But I can't find any. So, I'm
going to make some up.
Firstly, if this stuff is anywhere I've missed, that h
Hi there,
Thanks Roland for presenting the situation objectively. He has taken time to
elaborate on what led to the current undesirable situation and our IRC
discussion today. It is as he has said. I didn't see any significant
misrepresentation. [*]
I am very busy writing a paper and doing a b
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:04:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages?
>
> They all look good; make it so, I think. This one in particular:
Bugs sent for all bar qcl (
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages?
They all look good; make it so, I think. This one in particular:
> qcl: 4 month old RC bug, absolutely no interest from anyone to fix it.
> Nothing in twel
4 matches
Mail list logo
