Bug#160934: docbook-to-man: doesn't deal with non-optional arguments apparently...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I do'nt find the transpec specification that causes it to happen. Has this any effect on the output? Can I close the bugreport or tag it severtity minor? Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see

Bug#112105: marked as done (Ignores line breaks in programlisting, literal, screen)

Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#112105: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#189222: marked as done (docbook-to-man: Postscript header should be optional)

Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#189222: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#111918: marked as done (Incorrect output when nesting markup that enables bold and italic simultaneously)

Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:47:27 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#111918: fixed in docbook-to-man 1:2.0.0-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

libglade override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. libglade0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel.

libglade_0.17-2.8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.8_i386.deb libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.8_i386.deb to

Bug#201636: marked as done (libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Sep 2003 02:03:18 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libgtop-daemon: v1.0.13-7 install error has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#195985: NMU patch

The patch is the diff before running libtoolize, ... Changes to have an updated package : * Using automake 1.4, autoconf 2.13, libtool 1.4 * Comment AM_FUNC_ERROR_AT_LINE in macros/gnome-support.m4 * Add AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to configure.in (the patch has these changes, no changes after running

libglade_0.17-2.9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libglade/libglade-bonobo0_0.17-2.9_i386.deb libglade-gnome0-dev_0.17-2.9_i386.deb to

libgtop_1.0.13-7.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop-dev_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgtop/libgtop1_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb

libgtop override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libgtop-daemon_1.0.13-7.2_i386.deb: package says section is utils, override says admin. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and

Bug#195985: marked as done (undefined non-weak symbols / incomplete inter-library dependency information)

Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:34 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#195985: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#183979: marked as done (libgtop_1.0.13-4(mipsel/unstable): configure built from broken libtool.m4)

Your message dated Tue, 02 Sep 2003 20:48:33 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#183979: fixed in libgtop 1.0.13-7.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Re: Bug#208212: developer.php: please show binary package links sorted?

On Monday 01 September 2003 19:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: I know that display in the statusbar. The problem is not solved there because you still have to go through all of them and look into the statusbar It does not display in the statusbar. Igor added a title property, so it appears as a

Bug#208212: developer.php: please show binary package links sorted?

* Raphael Goulais [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-02 10:39:51 +0200]: On Monday 01 September 2003 19:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: I know that display in the statusbar. The problem is not solved there because you still have to go through all of them and look into the statusbar It does not

Bug#208212: developer.php: please show binary package links sorted?

Hi, Igor Genibel wrote: * Raphael Goulais [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-02 10:39:51 +0200]: On Monday 01 September 2003 19:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: I know that display in the statusbar. The problem is not solved there because you still have to go through all of them and look into the