On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:11:35AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[...]
> There is #201385, someone (CCed) wants to adopt this package. Lets hope
> he still wants this.
I talked to Rudy Godoy two weeks ago. He is willing to maintain usbmgr
and I've agreed to sponsor him. He was working on fixing #175
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is usbmgr still useful (as we have hotplug)?
Yes.
> Reason for this question is that usbmgr is orphaned and has one
> RC-grade bug, and if it is not useful any more, it should be rather
> removed than fixed. More infos on
> http://packages.qa.debian.o
Hi Andreas!
You wrote:
> > 1) When I find an old bug that looks like it wasn't ever a problem in the
> > package, what should I do? (See #103330 - > 2 years old, looks like a
> > busted
> > X install was at fault) - Do I close it? Tag it moreinfo, then wait a
> > while?
> In this special c
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:22:39PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> is usbmgr still useful (as we have hotplug)? Reason for this question
> is that usbmgr is orphaned and has one RC-grade bug, and if it is not
> useful any more, it should be rather removed than fixed.
>
> More infos on http://packag
* Josh Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040130 22:40]:
> I am interested in helping out with QA work in Debian, and I have a couple of
> questions related to bug triaging. I've looked at many of the bug reports
> for nedit, which was just taken over by the Debian QA Group, so I will use it
> to ill
I am interested in helping out with QA work in Debian, and I have a couple of
questions related to bug triaging. I've looked at many of the bug reports
for nedit, which was just taken over by the Debian QA Group, so I will use it
to illustrate my questions:
1) When I find an old bug that looks
Hi,
is usbmgr still useful (as we have hotplug)? Reason for this question
is that usbmgr is orphaned and has one RC-grade bug, and if it is not
useful any more, it should be rather removed than fixed.
More infos on http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/usbmgr.html
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:21:29AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:59:41PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This does indeed seem to be the case. I've marked iraf (and necessarily
> > iraf-noaobin too) to be removed from testing; it'll have a chance to
> > return if its release-c
Your submission to the list has been forwarded to the list
owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for approval because you do not seem to be on
that list.
If you want to join the list, send email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, with
"subscribe mutt-announce" in the message text (not the subject).
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:49:40PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> ==> remove iraf/2.11.3-2
>
> #223543: FTBFS -- requires a bootstrap process which doesn't autobuild
> #223532: Major FHS violation -- files under /usr/iraf
> #218793: ships /usr/bin/xpp, conflicting with xpp package (with no Confl
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 16:57, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Martin!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > It fails to build from source here (on mips):
> [...]
> > 16:37 so what's the fix?
> > 16:37 you'd need to upgrade it to libtool 1.5
>
> How?
>
Make sure you've got the libtool package (not libtool1.4) install
11 matches
Mail list logo
