Bug#220081: marked as done (39 packages unnecessarily still use "Bugs: debbugs://bugs.debian.org")

2004-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:17:06 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220081: fixed in fbgetty 0.1.698-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#87734 acknowledged by developer (Bug#87734: fixed in mined 2000.8-1)

2004-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #87734: ITP: mined -- a small unicode capable editor, which was filed against the wnpp package. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation is attached below. If

mga-vid - what's with the proposed upload?

2004-02-22 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. In September 2003 you announced to upload a fixed package "shortly". Since there is no sign of you in the bugs of this package. What's the status of it? Will a upload happen soon or are there problems that hinder you from maintaining this package? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROT

Bug#233564: marked as done (Developer.php performance (+patch))

2004-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:26:43 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Developer.php performance (+patch) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: Proposal for an advanced Debian-QA system

2004-02-22 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:53:54PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Saturday 21 February 2004 21:00, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote: > > > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system: > > > > The Debian-qa and debian devel co

Re: Developer.php performance (+patch)

2004-02-22 Thread Igor Genibel
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-18 19:30:05 +0100]: I applied the patch and modified backend scripts in order to have these functionalities into DDPO. This really increase the performances and permits users that have a lot of package to display correctly their page without tim

Re: Proposal for an advanced Debian-QA system

2004-02-22 Thread Riku Voipio
On Saturday 21 February 2004 21:00, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote: > > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system: > > The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all > > upstream version of a software u

Re: Proposal for an advanced Debian-QA system

2004-02-22 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 10:37:22PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote: > This are some idea for an advanced automatic Debian-qa system: > > The Debian-qa and debian devel could develop a system for trace all > upstream version of a software using the Debian/Watch file and uscan > tool and put this info in a

Re: Proposal for an advanced Debian-QA system

2004-02-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 02:20:14AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote: >... > > > So this alert sensors could perform some automatical tasks. For example: > > > > > > - Defcon 5 Send an automatic alert via email to Debian Qa > > > > What are the benefits of spamming Debian QA with hundreds of mails? > > To