Save Money, Buy GENERIC!
Prescription drugs with NO prior prescription needed!
- XANAX - (to treat anxiety)
- PHENTERMINE - (for weight loss)
- Viagra - (got wood?)
- Ambian - (For a Great Nights Sleep)
- Lipitor - (to reduce cholesterol)
- NEXIUM - (to treat acid reflux and GERD)
- PAXIL
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:25:03PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
The first problem (as has already been mentioned) is that in the absence
of symlinks the service will be started on upgrade even if it wasn't
running before the upgrade.
Well, there are long-standing bugs in debian's handling of servi
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:28, Michael Stone wrote:
> If a services is never automatically started by any
> runlevel the only way it will be running is if the admin launches it. I
> do this all the time for things I don't want running on an automatic
> basis, but which I might want when I'm testing s
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 23:30, Per Olofsson wrote:
> I'm suspecting that Brian Mays might be MIA. What I've found:
I was one of the people threatening B.M. with an NMU back in
October. I sent him a couple of messages and never got any
response. Joey and I abandoned our NMU plans when a large
numbe
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:40:22AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >rcconf should just be fixed to put kill links. "floating" instead of "off"
> >is a bad idea to begin with IMHO, unless you have the three states.
>
> You haven't given an act
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:40:22AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
rcconf should just be fixed to put kill links. "floating" instead of "off"
is a bad idea to begin with IMHO, unless you have the three states.
You haven't given an actual rationale for that but I'll explain why I
think
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 12:09, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:28:05AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> >The configuration is not interpreted to mean "no-op". As I said
> >before,
>
> you said it, but it's wrong.
>
> >There is evidently a lot of confusion surrounding this issue.
> >So
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 16:20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Can we just document this to be "Service state is not modified on runlevel
> > changes involving that runlevel"? At least, that is not a dangerous, nor
> > broken behaviour.
>
> Sorry, I
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 16:20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Can we just document this to be "Service state is not modified on runlevel
> changes involving that runlevel"? At least, that is not a dangerous, nor
> broken behaviour.
Sorry, I don't follow you here. Which documentation? Do you
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:00 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> That was Brian May, not Brian May_s_. ;-)
Yeah, I thought that somebody might mix them up but I forgot to add a
warning :)
Anyway, I should also have noted that since I am not a DD, I don't
have access to vacation and echelon infor
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-09 01:07]:
> > * It seems like there hasn't been any activity from him since his last
> > upload of pcmcia-cs from 8th November. Joey Hess said that the
> > upload was done only because he threatened to NMU it.
> [...]
>
> I don't think he is MIA,
Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Despite claims that he's around, James Lewis-Moss *still* isn't maintaining
> xemacs21 or xemacs21-packages at all properly -- he obviously doesn't have
> enough time. Look at the RC bugs, and note the total lack of comment from
> him.
Perhaps coul
Despite claims that he's around, James Lewis-Moss *still* isn't maintaining
xemacs21 or xemacs21-packages at all properly -- he obviously doesn't have
enough time. Look at the RC bugs, and note the total lack of comment from him.
He said he didn't want any NMUs. I don't think that's a remotely r
On 2004-03-08 Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm suspecting that Brian Mays might be MIA. What I've found:
> * It seems like there hasn't been any activity from him since his last
> upload of pcmcia-cs from 8th November. Joey Hess said that the
> upload was done only because he thre
14 matches
Mail list logo
