how do i get my free movie tickets please and thank you.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:49:59AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Luk Claes [Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:15 +0200]:
> > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > |>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine.
>
> > | So what explains the buildd failure
* Luk Claes [Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:15 +0200]:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine.
> | So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary
> | NMU so that at least we can get the p
Title: Email Message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
| Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
|>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine.
|
|
| So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary
| NMU so that at least we can get the pack
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine.
So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary
NMU so that at least we can get the package into testing?
BRIT Consulting E Logistica LTDA
Marketing Division
Avenida Conselheiro Nebias
n 340, group 64 vila Mathias
Santos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
scientific society in England to see and regret the weakness of government is bound to respect and protect The compact then and now thirty feet below it On t
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#101740: RFP: lib-arbortext-java -- sgml catalog classes for xslt,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below.
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#98608: RFP: kquick -- KDE GUI for *Quick, a fast single-click translator,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attache
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#98607: RFP: quick-dicts -- Free dictionaries for *Quick,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#95687: RFP: opmake -- OpenPackages.org make,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#78366: RFP: xmmp -- a modular, highly extendable multimedia system,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached belo
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#108345: RFP: libfbx -- a library of extensions to the linux framebuffer
subsystem,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#69952: RFP: dict-de-it -- italian-german dict dictionary,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If thi
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#101521: RFP: multiseti -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] utility for multiple packets,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attache
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#104385: RFP: wmmenu -- button bar dockapp,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation i
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#105521: RFP: gjukebox -- web-based jukebox,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#97963: RFP: maks -- software bundle for Euracom ISDN PABX,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If th
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#94308: RFP: mars-nwe -- netware emulator,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#82903: RFP: conf-isdn-account -- Configuration tool for ISDN cards,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached belo
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#88603: RFP: wavnorm -- set of tools to record, play and normalize wave files,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is att
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#91999: RFP: jce1.1-cryptix -- Java Cryptographic Extensions 1.1 implemented
by Cryptix,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their expla
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#95111: RFP: metaruby -- reimplementations of some ruby parts in ruby,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached be
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#82091: RFP: ithought -- an online diary composer,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explan
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#68296: RFP: ncp -- network copy program,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#73036: RFP: siggen -- a set of tools for imitating a laboratory Signal
Generator,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation i
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#80248: RFP: cpc4x -- An Amstrad CPC emulator for X11,
which was filed against the wnpp package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
| See bug http://bugs.debian.org/267927.
|
| I only just noticed the ppxp build failure, which is i386 specific.
| The -9 version was fine, but the -10 version fails. But the -10
| version only changed package descriptions
reopen 264172
severity 264172 important
thanks
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:40:50AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem is that clean doesn't need to be run. Policy says you should
> > be be able to build the package by just unpack
The upstream of PPxP semms very inactive. The homepage was not
modified sice 2001.
How many people use it? I think it's hard to keep it in Debian.
--
NOKUBI Takatsugu
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that clean doesn't need to be run. Policy says you should
> be be able to build the package by just unpacking and then running
> 'debian/rules binary'.
>
> Buildd's run clean first, but that isn't required, and a FTBFS when
> clea
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:12:41PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/264172.
> >
> > So I don't know what is the standard way to force an upload of a new
> > .orig.tar.gz file.
> >
> > Most people don't
See bug http://bugs.debian.org/267927.
I only just noticed the ppxp build failure, which is i386 specific.
The -9 version was fine, but the -10 version fails. But the -10
version only changed package descriptions and the maintainer address.
(All previous uploads were build by the maintainer on i
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't believe it is possible to upload a new orig.tar.gz for the same
> upstream version of a package. That's a fairly reasonable thing, IMHO --
> you really don't want the source for your package shifting under your
> feet...
Well, what we need is
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:12:41PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Most people don't see the bug, because we apt-get source as non-root,
> > so that tar unpackas without setting the setuid bit, and then the
> > package builds witho
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> See http://bugs.debian.org/264172.
>
> So I don't know what is the standard way to force an upload of a new
> .orig.tar.gz file.
I don't believe it is possible to upload a new orig.tar.gz for the same
upstream version of a p
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 09:35:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> See http://bugs.debian.org/264172.
>
> So I don't know what is the standard way to force an upload of a new
> .orig.tar.gz file.
>
> Most people don't see the bug, because we apt-get source as non-root,
> so that tar unpacka
37 matches
Mail list logo
