Hi Gordon, QA people,
Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently in
violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other release-critical
problems. It also has a number of deficiencies, and with better alternatives
like prboom I'd suggest removal.
- doomlegacy
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > question about a removal from testing:
> > >
> > > openmosix
> > >
> > > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
> >
> > Actually, I was working on that al
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently
> in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other
> release-critical problems. It also has a number of deficiencies,
> and with better alternatives like prboom I'd sugg
On 2004-09-04 Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do you still want to maintain doomlegacy in Debian? It's currently
> > in violation of Raven Corp.'s license in upstream, and has other
> > release-critical problems. It also has a number
4 matches
Mail list logo