Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>If people don't care as much about this as you think they should, >>perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *should* >>care, instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic >>understanding of your intentions? > This is not true. Y

old RFPs (was: RFP+ITP for the same package)

2005-02-27 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050219 22:20]: > > Should I rename the RFP to ITP and merge them or simply > > close the RFP? > Please do the former; this way the person who filed the RFP will be > informed when the package enters the archive. BTW: I recently take a look at the WNPP

Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Bluefuture
>The community might start considering it less useless if an >explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually >available. In particular, why should a maintainer care about watch >files if he uses something else than uscan to keep track of upstream >happenings? >From time to time, th

Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There is no reason to put more work and effort on a community tool that > community itself consider useless. The community might start considering it less useless if an explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually available. In particula

dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Bluefuture
After another gruelling discussion on #debian-devel about the useless of dehs and the lack of watch file (75,60% of non native debian packages doesn't had one), I think that dehs is start to begin only my own personal toys, so i'm thinking to stop it and to leave alioth resources and put my develop