Message Personnel de la Responsable de Collection Vertbaudet

Si vous ne recevez pas correctement ce message cliquez ici.

Bug#334698: closed by Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (Re: Bug#334698: htdig: AMD64 arch corrupts databases)

Bad move. Debian uses a separate package for the 3.2 and 3.1 versions due to large performance difference (3.2 does more, but is much more resource hungry). Please reopen and mark wontfix. On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 5:55 pm, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification

libpcd_1.0.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libpcd-dev_1.0.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libpcd/libpcd-dev_1.0.1-1_i386.deb libpcd2_1.0.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libp/libpcd/libpcd2_1.0.1-1_i386.deb libpcd_1.0.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libpcd/libpcd_1.0.1-1.diff.gz libpcd_1.0.1-1.dsc to

Processing of libpcd_1.0.1-1_i386.changes

libpcd_1.0.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libpcd_1.0.1-1.dsc libpcd_1.0.1.orig.tar.gz libpcd_1.0.1-1.diff.gz libpcd2_1.0.1-1_i386.deb libpcd-dev_1.0.1-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#334698: closed by Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reply to Christopher Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]) (Re: Bug#334698: htdig: AMD64 arch corrupts databases)

Hi, Actually, Debian has never had more than one version of htdig in the archive. This was 3.1 until my recent upload, which replaced it with 3.2b6. The 3.1 package was hopelessly uninstallable and RC buggy - the official count didn't take into consideration bugs (like #334698) which weren't

Processing of discover-data_2.2005.02.13-2_i386.changes

discover-data_2.2005.02.13-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: discover-data_2.2005.02.13-2.dsc discover-data_2.2005.02.13-2.diff.gz discover-data-udeb_2.2005.02.13-2_all.udeb discover-data_2.2005.02.13-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

picax_1.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: picax_1.4.dsc to pool/main/p/picax/picax_1.4.dsc picax_1.4.tar.gz to pool/main/p/picax/picax_1.4.tar.gz picax_1.4_all.deb to pool/main/p/picax/picax_1.4_all.deb Override entries for your package: picax_1.4.dsc - source utils picax_1.4_all.deb - optional utils Announcing to

Processing of picax_1.4_i386.changes

picax_1.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: picax_1.4.dsc picax_1.4.tar.gz picax_1.4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

etherconf_1.18_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: etherconf_1.18.dsc to pool/main/e/etherconf/etherconf_1.18.dsc etherconf_1.18.tar.gz to pool/main/e/etherconf/etherconf_1.18.tar.gz etherconf_1.18_all.deb to pool/main/e/etherconf/etherconf_1.18_all.deb Override entries for your package: etherconf_1.18.dsc - source net

Processing of etherconf_1.18_i386.changes

etherconf_1.18_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: etherconf_1.18.dsc etherconf_1.18.tar.gz etherconf_1.18_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

gnome-tasksel_0.9.7.2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gnome-tasksel_0.9.7.2.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-tasksel/gnome-tasksel_0.9.7.2.dsc gnome-tasksel_0.9.7.2.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-tasksel/gnome-tasksel_0.9.7.2.tar.gz gnome-tasksel_0.9.7.2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-tasksel/gnome-tasksel_0.9.7.2_all.deb Override entries for

Bug#381121: http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html outdated

Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, because a wml file leads to errors. Thanks for the pointer, should be fixed now. Cheers, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BTS pages on qa.d.o

Hi, Should we replace qa.d.o/bts-{help,security,unreproducible}.html with links to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=tag? Cheers, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BTS pages on qa.d.o

* Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-04 10:02]: Should we replace qa.d.o/bts-{help,security,unreproducible}.html with links to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=tag? Yes, please. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Bug#380631: marked as forwarded (do not require approved header for emails to tags)

Your message dated Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:14:42 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #380631, regarding do not require approved header for emails to tags to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a

Bug#380631: exim4.conf patch

tags 380631 + patch thanks This should do, but I am not an exim person and have not verified this. There's probably also a nicer way to do this. --- exim4.conf 2006-07-19 11:42:05.0 -0500 +++ /tmp/exim4.conf 2006-08-04 05:11:56.0 -0500 @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ require verify =

Bug#380631: or this

According to #exim/irc.freenode.org, this should also work. See (11.9 Expansion variables of the spec) of the manual: accept recipients = [EMAIL PROTECTED] denyhosts = !+debianhosts condition = ${if [EMAIL PROTECTED] def:h_X-PTS-Approved:{false}{true}}}{false}}

Bug#381121: marked as done (http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html outdated)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:34:48 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#381121: http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html outdated has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#380631: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:25:35PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist The requirement for the X-PTS-Approved header is IMHO questionably, but I guess that's the way it is. Could you let messages to keywords straight through, though? [EMAIL

Re: Bug#381463: www.debian.org: packages in need of help - also bugs tagged help

reassign 381463 qa.debian.org thanks On Friday 04 August 2006 18:39, Bart Martens wrote: I would add a link to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=help on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ near packages in need of help which currently points to

Re: Bug#381463: www.debian.org: packages in need of help - also bugs tagged help

* Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-04 19:43]: This is something completely different from requesting help with a specific bug. IMO the wnpp page should remain package oriented and restricted to real wnpp bugs. I think your suggestion to add that link somewhere is good. IMO it would

Processed: Re: Bug#381463: www.debian.org: packages in need of help - also bugs tagged help

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 381463 qa.debian.org Bug#381463: www.debian.org: packages in need of help - also bugs tagged help Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Stephen M Moraco appears to be Rarely In Action

I see that Stephen still makes uploads on some of his packages, but I strongly suggest that he give away some of them because they're in really bad shape. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]