Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:13 +0100, Marcus Better wrote: [...] > Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive? Since you asked ;-) - no, at least for local parts (i.e. the portion preceding the @). In fact, they MUST NOT (in the BCP14 meaning of that phrase) be. From RFC2821: Verbs and argume

Re: Bits for Bits from the QA meeting

2007-01-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-18 17:04]: > > Someone on IRC asked what we did at the QA meeting. Basically, we had > > a number of informal talks (see the links Holger posted) and some > > people worked on things together. However, I think most people mainly > > did release related

Bug#406615: PTS: Please do not use experimental changelog

2007-01-12 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Package: qa.debian.org Hi, On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 11:15 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I was looking at the master changelog on packages.qa.debian.org. It's > annoying that it doesn't track experimental and unstable separately. I've been annoyed at this before and your message prompted me

Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-12 Thread Marcus Better
reopen 359044 thanks This broke again. Please compare http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The first shows 88 packages, the second only one. Perhaps the fix to #370454 broke it? Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive? Marcus pgpjOozfbZOKW.

Processed: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 359044 Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm