On 27/02/07 at 10:53 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> (We had a small exchange via private email with Lucas and he suggested
> we continue the discussion on debian-qa@, hence full text included
> below.)
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 24/02/07 at 16:34
Hi,
The release of etch is approaching, and we now have a good idea of the
list of packages that won't make it into etch. It would be interesting
to review all those packages, because something might be wrong about
them:
- they might be target for removals from debian
- their maintainers might be
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The release of etch is approaching, and we now have a good idea of the
> list of packages that won't make it into etch. It would be interesting
> to review all those packages, because something might be wrong about
> them:
> - they
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Any comments/suggestions on the proposed workflow ?
Thanks for adding me, I've already started on some packages I was
involved in earlier (e.g. via NMU's). I'm using "MAINTAINER_PINGED" for
those where I've contacted the maintainer for mor
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 12:55 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > 1. A list of packages matching:
> >"was in sid on etch freeze date, is still in sid, but isn't in etch"
> >is generated and commited to the collab-qa svn repository
>
> T
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 10:41 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Well, what I'm looking for is:
>
> [A] People with good ideas of tests that would improve Debian's
> quality, or Free Software's quality in general
>
> [B] People willing to help with providing code for the tests, and
> providing
(Please CC: me, I'm not subscribed)
Re: http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:34:21 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Identifying RC bugs
* Neil Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070228
On 28/02/07 at 12:55 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I propose the following workflow:
> > 1. A list of packages matching:
> >"was in sid on etch freeze date, is still in sid, but isn't in etch"
> >is generated and commited to the collab-qa svn repository
>
> That excludes young packages
On 28/02/07 at 13:21 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 12:55 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > 1. A list of packages matching:
> > >"was in sid on etch freeze date, is still in sid, but isn't in etch"
> > >is gen
On 28/02/07 at 12:58 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Any comments/suggestions on the proposed workflow ?
>
> Thanks for adding me, I've already started on some packages I was
> involved in earlier (e.g. via NMU's). I'm using "MAINTAINER_
10 matches
Mail list logo
