Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert writes: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Then how about sending a mail if one of the packages has (serious, >> certain) lintian errors? > Lintian currently still uses the EWI code when generating the report > which later udd imports. This file lacks the severity and certainty > inform

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-27 Thread Raphael Geissert
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Then how about sending a mail if one of the packages has (serious, > certain) lintian errors? Lintian currently still uses the EWI code when generating the report which later udd imports. This file lacks the severity and certainty information, which means it would be ne

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:33:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > If you think the severity and/or certainty of a given tag is incorrect then > > please do file a bug report against lintian so that it is discussed if > > needed and fixed. > Then how about sending a mail if one of the packages has

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 27/04/09 at 15:23 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > I really don't think that we should send emails to maintainers if they > > only have lintian errors (no other problems, like RC bugs). If those > > lintian errors are so grave, maybe (RC) bugs should be filed? > >

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-27 Thread Raphael Geissert
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I really don't think that we should send emails to maintainers if they > only have lintian errors (no other problems, like RC bugs). If those > lintian errors are so grave, maybe (RC) bugs should be filed? Every check has a severity and certainty, so in theory if they th

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

2009-04-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/04/09 at 12:00 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:37:04 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > Would it be ok to leave it that way? or only mention lintian errors? or only > > when the same package has serious issues? or only when the same package > > does *not* have any se

Bug#523671: still broken

2009-04-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Apparently, it has not been fixed with later runs: Whoever committed the fix forgot to update the live copy on master. It's not updated automatically on commit. Done now. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Contribuez à Debian et gagnez un cahier de l'admin

Bug#523671: still broken

2009-04-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Apparently, it has not been fixed with later runs: $ lynx -dump http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mksh.html […] Overview of [4]mksh source package General information Latest version 37.3-2 Maintainer [5]Thorsten Glaser [6][email] Maintenance[7]DMUA Co