On 11/10/12 at 05:50 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> | Anyone can mark a package as orphaned after the following steps have been
> | completed : Someone submits an "intent to orphan" (ITO) in the bts with
> an
> | explanation of why he/she thinks that the package needs a new
> maintainer.
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for coming back on this.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:04:33AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/09/12 at 18:48 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > we may all agree that the maintenance of some (many?) packages in Debian
> > is in a unclear situation. There is a transient
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> So, reading this thread (which was surprisingly quiet, given the topic),
> it seems that everybody agrees that such a procedure would be a good
> thing (nobody had fundamental concerns). But now we have two proposed
> procedures:
> - one wh
On 28/09/12 at 18:48 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we may all agree that the maintenance of some (many?) packages in Debian
> is in a unclear situation. There is a transient state, where people are
> interested to bring a package in shape but the strong role of a package
> maintainer in Deb
On 12995 March 1977, Paul Wise wrote:
> webwml is another example of a group that is different between alioth
> and other Debian hosts.
Thats simple: alioth is not a debian.org host. It "only" has the domain
and syncs parts of the debian ud-ldap data, and admins overlap. But
besides that, its a d
5 matches
Mail list logo
