On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:15:34PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:24:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> and maybe add something to DeveloperNews.
>
> Added a general QA section, if anyone has any other changes I missed,
I suggest to implement the following instead :
The package's standards version should match the version of the package
"debian-policy" in the same distribution as the package. This should be
checked in distributions testing, unstable and experimental. If there is no
debian-policy in the distribu
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:24:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Did you mean to submit that to debian-devel?
>
> I meant debian-qa but feel free to forward.
Will think about it.
>> and maybe add something to DeveloperNews.
>
> Feel free to do t
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
> Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.3 instead of 3.9.4)." but this is wrong.
I wonder if we should instead define two versions:
latest: 3.9.4
unstable: 3.9.3
Since policy
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The PTS says:
"The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.3 instead of 3.9.4)." but this is wrong.
Index: www/xsl/pts.xsl
===
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 04:24:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Did you mean to submit that to debian-devel?
I meant debian-qa but feel free to forward.
> and maybe add something to DeveloperNews.
Feel free to do that.
> Probably some mention of wnpp-alert is in order here.
In case you
Did you mean to submit that to debian-devel? and maybe add something
to DeveloperNews.
Probably some mention of wnpp-alert is in order here.
Also, could you move that directory to the main QA space instead of ~bartm?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
7 matches
Mail list logo
