Re: PTS: RC bugs in dependencies

2013-05-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 10 May 2013, Bart Martens wrote: > > I would also suggest not displaying bugs where someone is actively taking > > care of it (i.e. when a owner is set even though it's not often used). > > Creative idea, but I'm afraid that setting the owner is not a sufficiently > common practice to base

Re: PTS: RC bugs in dependencies

2013-05-10 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:03:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013, Paul Wise wrote: > > I wonder if doing this recursively is a good idea or not. If we decide > > to do that, your approach to limit the recursion is a good one. > > I also tend to think that doing it recursively

Re: PTS: RC bugs in dependencies

2013-05-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > To start with a small sample. Also, I think that some RC bugs are easy to > fix, > so don't need advertising on so many PTS pages. For example, some FTBFS bugs > can be quite easy to fix. Now, where to draw the line. Bugs tagged "help" >

Re: PTS: RC bugs in dependencies

2013-05-10 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > > There are RC bugs in dependencies : #579647 #545414 #658739 #566351 > > #368297 #601667 #658896 #628671 > > Several of these bugs are merged, I think we should only link to one

Re: PTS: RC bugs in dependencies

2013-05-10 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:51:08AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > I wonder if doing this recursively is a good idea or not. If we decide > > to do that, your approach to limit the recursion is a good one. > > AOL on the fact that d

Re: Call for help: archive rebuilds

2013-05-10 Thread Agustin Henze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lucas, On 05/09/2013 06:32 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > I'm unlikely to be able to do much archive rebuild work in the coming > year, so I would welcome help on that front. > > Here is the "job" description: - maintain scripts to organize

Re: PTS: RC bugs in dependencies

2013-05-10 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:24:56PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > I started from RC bugs (grave, critical, serious) tagged "help". We > > currently > > have 18 RC bugs tagged "help". I matches these 18 bugs with all reverse > > dependencies, recursively, both build- and plain reverse dependencies.

Re: PTS: RC bugs in dependencies

2013-05-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 10 May 2013, Paul Wise wrote: > > Comments ? > > I wonder if doing this recursively is a good idea or not. If we decide > to do that, your approach to limit the recursion is a good one. I also tend to think that doing it recursively is not a good idea in general. Or maybe only for pa