Your message dated Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:34:41 +
with message-id
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 3062
has caused the Debian Bug report #720317,
regarding qa.debian.org: fakeupstream.cgi does not redirect to the correct
upstream file for qtapps
to be marked as done.
This me
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Pavlos wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the correct place to submit these but i would
> like to add the attatched scripts to http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/
> I need them for the debian android app i'm making for gsoc 2013.
> Three of them are the same as the origi
I was a bit reluctant to change existing scripts. Especially since I
don't have any experience with ruby.
I'll try to fix the original scripts then and will get back to you. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to submit these but i would
like to add the attatched scripts to http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/
I need them for the debian android app i'm making for gsoc 2013.
Three of them are the same as the original ones and just return the
results in a csv for
>> I have just found that package jwchat has very outdated static data at its
>> PTS page [1]. How to remove this block?
>
> The current version of the PTS does not allow the removal of news
> items, see the last paragraph of this:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/resour
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Boris Pek wrote:
> I have just found that package jwchat has very outdated static data at its
> PTS page [1]. How to remove this block?
The current version of the PTS does not allow the removal of news
items, see the last paragraph of this:
http://www.debian.org/
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When using uscan to see if there is a new version
of dianara package, uscan shows that there is a new
version but can not download it:
$ uscan
dianara: Newer version (0.9) available on remote site:
http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/fakeupst
Hi team,
I have just found that package jwchat has very outdated static data at its
PTS page [1]. How to remove this block?
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/jwchat
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Hi,
> I still think it would be useful to display a todo item when a package
> "should" have a screenshot but doesn't. We just need to work out the
> right heuristics for that.
Just a small note. Packages from non-free and contrib areas should be
filtered on the first step of check, because scree
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Fix copy-waste fail in block list
> unblock 718417 with 713073
Bug #718417 [release.debian.org] transition: grib-api
718417 was blocked by: 713073
718417 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 718417: 713073
> block 718417 with 72
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 718417 with 713073
Bug #718417 [release.debian.org] transition: grib-api
718417 was not blocked by any bugs.
718417 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 718417: 713073
> tags 718417 + pending
Bug #718417 [release.debian.org] t
Le 20/08/2013 09:41, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> I think the reason why we prefer having the introducing source package
> as "unaffected", is because it will be taken care of by a source upload
> (i.e. there is usually nothing for us to do about that package). [...]
The tool was meant to track packa
On 2013-08-20 09:24, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 16/08/2013 17:29, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
>> @Release team: Joachim Breitner asked to patch PTS so that it displays
>> not only the packages involved in a transition, but also the packages
>> that cause the transition (see the example below).
>
Le 16/08/2013 17:29, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit :
> @Release team: Joachim Breitner asked to patch PTS so that it displays
> not only the packages involved in a transition, but also the packages
> that cause the transition (see the example below).
> [...]
> Is Ben aware of this information? If so,
14 matches
Mail list logo
