Bug#758884: marked as done (jenkins.d.n: broken qemu vncserver, please downgrade or apply workaround)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:40:48 -0700 with message-id <201408221040.49552.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#758884: jenkins.d.n: broken qemu vncserver, please downgrade or apply workaround has caused the Debian Bug report #758884, regarding jenkins.d.n: broken qemu vncse

Bug#758906: tracker.debian.org: link to squeeze-lts source package is invalid

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 My package cacti has a release in old-lts. Under "versions" [1] there is a link to [2], which gives the following error: "two or more packages specified (cacti squeeze-lts)". I don't know what (if it exi

Bug#758289: package in NEW not listed as pending upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, > On 22 August 2014 12:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> The package libmoox-cmd-perl is in the NEW queue: >> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libmoox-cmd-perl_0.009-1.html >> >> ...but still - after several days - lists as "Owned WNPP bugs", no

Re: package in NEW not listed as pending upload

On 22 August 2014 12:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi, > > The package libmoox-cmd-perl is in the NEW queue: > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libmoox-cmd-perl_0.009-1.html > > ...but still - after several days - lists as "Owned WNPP bugs", not > "Pending uploads" at my DDPO page: > https://qa.d

Bug#758884: jenkins.d.n: broken qemu vncserver, please downgrade or apply workaround

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: jenkins Dear Maintainer, qemu 2.1 vncserver is broken, see #758881. Please downgrade qemu to 2.0.0+dfsg-4~bpo70+1 and apt-mark-hold it or apply patch from my "vncdoworkaround" branch@github. Thanks for c

Re: Sources required by Built-Using break multiple assumptions?

Hello Guillem, Guillem Jover (2014-08-22): > Hi! > > I was mightily confused when I saw that supposedly dpkg 1.17.12, which > had an RC bug filed and had not spent enough time to transition had > “migrated” [M], w/o any sign of MIGRATION mail, nor any release team > hint directive. > > This is

Sources required by Built-Using break multiple assumptions?

Hi! I was mightily confused when I saw that supposedly dpkg 1.17.12, which had an RC bug filed and had not spent enough time to transition had “migrated” [M], w/o any sign of MIGRATION mail, nor any release team hint directive. This is what rmadison has to say about this: ,--- dpkg | 1.17.10 |

package in NEW not listed as pending upload

Hi, The package libmoox-cmd-perl is in the NEW queue: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libmoox-cmd-perl_0.009-1.html ...but still - after several days - lists as "Owned WNPP bugs", not "Pending uploads" at my DDPO page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@jones.dk&comaint=yes Is t