Bug#745524: Please migrate to lcms2

2014-09-02 Thread Thomas Weber
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 09:17:01AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Debian switched from liblcms1 to liblcms2 but it looks like that xsane is not able to use the newer version of the library. Do you think you could update it to support it? Fedora has a patch for it:

Bug#459647: I can reproduce this too

2014-09-02 Thread Faheem Mitha
This bug is present in 1.5-cvs20081009-1, 6 years later. Was this ever reported upstream? Regards, Faheem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#756117: Resurrecting patch-tracker.d.o

2014-09-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Colin Henri, I saw on #debian-admin that both of you are interested in resurrecting patch-tracker.debian.org. I don't know what are your plans but I would like to suggest you to try to resurrect it within the context of Distro-Tracker aka the software behind http://tracker.debian.org Distro

Bug#756117: Resurrecting patch-tracker.d.o

2014-09-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:57:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: I saw on #debian-admin that both of you are interested in resurrecting patch-tracker.debian.org. I don't know what are your plans but I would like to suggest you to try to resurrect it within the context of Distro-Tracker aka the

Re: Bug#756117: Resurrecting patch-tracker.d.o

2014-09-02 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 09:03:59PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Wouldn't a better approach be to resurrect the existing service as-is for the sake of the people who want to use it today, and *then* worry about getting somebody to reimplement it on top of a different framework? Yes, definitely.

Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

2014-09-02 Thread Simon Kainz
Hello, i found some (well, 27) packages where the Homepage: entry in the control file is different than the Homepage: entry in the upstream-metadata file. (Althouh 27 is now much right now, i actually expect this number to increase, as there surely will be more upstream-metadata per package in

Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

2014-09-02 Thread David Prévot
Hi, Le 02/09/2014 17:04, Simon Kainz a écrit : mira upstream-metadata: http://www.chevreux.org/projects_mira.html control-file: http://chevreux.org/projects_mira.html diff size: 34 lines Please note that those differences are just of the self-link kind, as translated by lynx:

Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

2014-09-02 Thread Simon Kainz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-09-03 05:11, schrieb David Prévot: Hi, Le 02/09/2014 17:04, Simon Kainz a écrit : mira upstream-metadata: http://www.chevreux.org/projects_mira.html control-file: http://chevreux.org/projects_mira.html diff size: 34 lines Please