zvbi_0.2.35-3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libzvbi0_0.2.35-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libzvbi-dev_0.2.35-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libzvbi-common_0.2.35-3_all.deb
libzvbi-doc_0.2.35-3_all.deb
zvbi_0.2.35-3_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
zvbi_0.2.35-3.dsc
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 17:56:38 +
Source: zvbi
Binary: libzvbi0 libzvbi-dev libzvbi-common libzvbi-doc zvbi
Architecture: source kfreebsd-amd64 all
Version: 0.2.35-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
Your message dated Sun, 21 Sep 2014 18:19:15 +
with message-id e1xvlj9-0005ln...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#731481: fixed in zvbi 0.2.35-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #731481,
regarding zvbi: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*/hurd-i386 due to missing symbols
to be marked as done.
This
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think this fall back should not be used, except for packages that
build a single binary. It results in nonsense like:
[ quoted text edit to add references ]
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:39:13PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
1) When only one binary package, use the description from it.
2) When more than one binary package but one has the same name as the
source package, use the description from that.
3)
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Uhm, interesting, I always thought the heuristic was slightly
difference.
It was always that way FYI.
Is there an argument for not replacing point (3) above with:
(3*) Otherwise, use the description of the first binary in
6 matches
Mail list logo
