Version: 1.0-12+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package tslib has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/751768
The
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libts-0.0-0 | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel,
powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
libts-0.0-0-dbg | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel,
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
anubis | 4.1.1+dfsg1-4 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
--- Reason
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #624043,
regarding anubis: Uses deprecated _set_priority GnuTLS functions
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #643975,
regarding anubis: compiled without GPG support on some architectures
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #661030,
regarding anubis: Use packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #727318,
regarding anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{libtool,aclocal}.m4
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #681615,
regarding apt output error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #727318,
regarding anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{libtool,aclocal}.m4
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #728917,
regarding anubis: PAM config not working anymore with Wheezy
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #745989,
regarding anubis: please migrate to guile-2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #749439,
regarding anubis: Multiple and conflicting definitions of function error
to be marked as
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id e1xgxli-0008by...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753371,
regarding misconfigure pam rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:32:15 +
with message-id e1xgxfj-00067h...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#751768: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #678144,
regarding wrong ABS_PRESSURE test in input_raw / tslib to old
to be marked as done.
This
Se désinscrire de la liste:
http://link.email.wib.me/u/443/3d177fb97c135049c174fd34116f5a5f28cf5a1abf07aabc
Rue Molière, Casablanca, 2, Maroc
It looks like this might be possible now.
$ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org dak rm -Rn emacs23
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1 | source
emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 +
with message-id e1xgftn-0002xz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#760954: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #760954,
regarding robocode: depends on obsolete Java 6 JRE
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 +
with message-id e1xgftn-0002xt...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#738018: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #738018,
regarding robocode: please provide a menu file and icons
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 +
with message-id e1xgftn-0002xf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#766068: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #766068,
regarding robocode: fails to start because of obsolete Java environment
detection
to be
It seems that
https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/testing_main/index.html is normally
updated daily but it hasn't updated for a couple of days, can someone
take a look and see where it's snarled up?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debsources
Hi.
Currently somefiles are hard-coded with /usr/bin/python. e.g.,
debiansources-run-app and the alike.
This makes the code less portable, and inhibiting the use of
virtualenv.
If we use
severity 766162 normal
tags 766162 + confirmed
user debian-qa@lists.debian.org
usertag 766162 + gift
thanks
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 05:00:49PM +0800, sophiejjj wrote:
Currently somefiles are hard-coded with /usr/bin/python. e.g.,
debiansources-run-app and the alike.
This makes the code less
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 766162 normal
Bug #766162 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: Use 'env' instead of /usr/bin/python
to make source more portable.
Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist'
tags 766162 + confirmed
Bug #766162 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: Use
Hello!
One of my packages, wmhdplop, has a Build-Depends on gkrellm, which does
not appear on !linux. This is reported on its debcheck page [1].
However, wmhdplop has its architecture set as linux-any. It seems
that this issue shouldn't be reported.
Thanks!
Doug Torrance
[1]
25 matches
Mail list logo
