Your message dated Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:54:38 +
with message-id <20141022175438.ga22...@master.debian.org>
and subject line DDPO: tulip 4.6.0 missed despite uscan seeing it
has caused the Debian Bug report #764999,
regarding DDPO: tulip 4.6.0 missed despite uscan seeing it
to be marked as done.
On 22 October 2014 15:13, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Ok. Would you like to try to provide a patch? It's really easy.
>
> A bit more complicated given the above but nothing unachievable:
> https://tracker.debian.org/docs/contributing.html
>
Sure I would like to patch it myself, but I have no time r
(sorry posted too quickly and forgot to finish my explanations)
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > * a link in the "links" section
>
> We only display such links when they do work.
Which means we have to know what packages are available. Fortunately
that information is already ava
Hi Arturo,
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Package: tracker.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi there!
>
> It would be nice if you add a link to ci.debian.net in each package page at
> tracker.debian.org.
>
> I think they are both good idea:
> * a link in the "links"
On 2014-10-22 12:36, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:18:34AM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
>> On 10/20/2014 09:37 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> > I'm afraid this is not the case, some of my packages still show
>> > month-old dates, eg:
>>
>> That's not necessarily an indication of
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi there!
It would be nice if you add a link to ci.debian.net in each package page at
tracker.debian.org.
I think they are both good idea:
* a link in the "links" section
* a warning in the "action needed" section if the package's tests fail
Pl
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:18:34AM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 09:37 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > I'm afraid this is not the case, some of my packages still show
> > month-old dates, eg:
>
> That's not necessarily an indication of the service not working. It's an
> indication o
On 10/20/2014 09:37 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> I'm afraid this is not the case, some of my packages still show
> month-old dates, eg:
That's not necessarily an indication of the service not working. It's an
indication of a low frequency of the checks, yes.
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Your message dated Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:22:25 +0200
with message-id <20141022072225.ga29...@upsilon.cc>
and subject line Re: Bug#766162: qa.debian.org: Use 'env' instead of
/usr/bin/python to make source more portable.
has caused the Debian Bug report #766162,
regarding qa.debian.org: Use 'env' ins
9 matches
Mail list logo
