Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debsources
Hi,
I would love to see more statistics about packages sizes in debsources.
For example, I wonder if the average package size (in LOC) decreases or
increases. It could increase because
Package: texi2html
Version: 1.82+dfsg1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed
that texi2html could not allow to built documentation reproducibly.
The attached patch adds the flag
http://ci.debian.net and autopkgtest are awesome.
Has anyone thought of writing something like apt-listbugs that checks
package upgrades/new installs against the CI data recently?
Seems like an obvious and easy win towards getting a safely upgradable
rolling release debian version based on CI
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: newcomer
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: debsources
Debsources can show news items on the index page (see News section at the
bottom of http://sources.debian.net/). The feature broke during the recent
blueprint refactoring, when the
Package: texi2html
Version: 1.82+dfsg1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi!
While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed
that texi2html could not be built reproducibly.
The attached patch removes extra
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
bugs.cgi needs to be updated for stretch. It might be a good opportunity
to revisit some design choices
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'),
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 783478 by 783475
Bug #783478 [texi2html] texi2html: [PATCH] Please make the build reproducible
783478 was not blocked by any bugs.
783478 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 783478: 783475
End of message, stopping processing
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
Hi,
I am writing to warn aspell dict maintainers (aspell dict packages bcc'ed,
sorry for the dups) about a problem we noticed in current jessie aspell.
This problem is not RC, so a fixed aspell will not go into jessie, but
will
Hi Neil,
thanks for sharing your interesting plans and sorry for the late reply...
On Freitag, 20. Februar 2015, Neil Williams wrote:
what is this lava stuff?
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/lava-server
Continuous integration system currently in use for kernel and
bootloader testing on
9 matches
Mail list logo