Re: Stepping back from the Debian XML/SGML team, effectively orphaning all my packages (docbook*, xml-core, xmlto, etc. pp)

Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 22:08 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose: > Dear Daniel and Osamu, > > > I have XML expertise, I am a DD, and I maintain nothing for now (only > have a few ITPs out). > > > Any chance you would be at DebCamp and could do a two day intense > "catchup" on the involved work?

Re: Stepping back from the Debian XML/SGML team, effectively orphaning all my packages (docbook*, xml-core, xmlto, etc. pp)

Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 19:00 +0200 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: > On 2015-05-28 23:24, Daniel Leidert wrote: [not using DB toolchain] > Just out of curiosity: What are you using now? I haven't done much documentation lately. But I use GROFF for writing manual pages for Debian packages. Even wi

Bug#647565: marked as done (madison.cgi: make it produce an easier to parse output)

Your message dated Sun, 31 May 2015 06:15:16 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 3377 has caused the Debian Bug report #647565, regarding madison.cgi: make it produce an easier to parse output to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#787225: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Bug graph URLs (/data/bts/graphs/…) reporting 403 errors)

Your message dated Sun, 31 May 2015 05:35:50 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 3376 has caused the Debian Bug report #787225, regarding qa.debian.org: Bug graph URLs (/data/bts/graphs/…) reporting 403 errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: reopening 787225

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 787225 Bug #787225 {Done: Paul Wise } [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: Bug graph URLs (/data/bts/graphs/…) reporting 403 errors 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and

Bug#787225: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Bug graph URLs (/data/bts/graphs/…) reporting 403 errors)

Your message dated Sun, 31 May 2015 04:55:00 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 3375 has caused the Debian Bug report #787225, regarding qa.debian.org: Bug graph URLs (/data/bts/graphs/…) reporting 403 errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Re: Failed to update repositories

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Yassine Z. wrote: > FetchFailedException: W:Failed to fetch > http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/oldoldstable/Release > Unable to find expected entry 'updates/main/source/Sources' in Release file > (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed This appears to be a bug i

Re: Stepping back from the Debian XML/SGML team, effectively orphaning all my packages (docbook*, xml-core, xmlto, etc. pp)

Dear Daniel and Osamu, I have XML expertise, I am a DD, and I maintain nothing for now (only have a few ITPs out). Any chance you would be at DebCamp and could do a two day intense "catchup" on the involved work? Best, Kris On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi Daniel,

Bug#787272: marked as done (sf.net redirector broken?)

Your message dated Sun, 31 May 2015 01:28:14 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 3362 has caused the Debian Bug report #787272, regarding sf.net redirector broken? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Re: Bug#787272: sf.net redirector broken?

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 02:59:58PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > Looks like this is related to . > The attached patch is working for me. Updated patch to a) use the ca-certificates.crt file and b) check if it exists first. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3

Re: sf.net redirector broken?

Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: webpages Tags: patch On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 02:07:48PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:55:27PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > Running uscan on packages using the sf.net redirector will results in: >

Re: sf.net redirector broken?

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:55:27PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Running uscan on packages using the sf.net redirector will results in: > $ uscan --verbose --report > uscan warning: In debian/watch, > no matching hrefs for watch line > http://sf.net/wine/wine-(.+)\.tar\.bz2 > -- Scan finished

Re: [xml/sgml] Stepping back from the Debian XML/SGML team, effectively orphaning all my packages (docbook*, xml-core, xmlto, etc. pp)

On 2015-05-28 23:24, Daniel Leidert wrote: > I was part of the Debian XML/SGML team [1] for quite some time and it > was fun maintaining the whole DocBook toolchain. Unfortunately I'm not > using it anymore and thus have lost interest in these packages. Now > after Jessie has been released, I'm fin

sf.net redirector broken?

Running uscan on packages using the sf.net redirector will results in: $ uscan --verbose --report uscan warning: In debian/watch, no matching hrefs for watch line http://sf.net/wine/wine-(.+)\.tar\.bz2 -- Scan finished This are also also a lot of broken dehs pages: http://dehs.alioth.debian.or

Re: Stepping back from the Debian XML/SGML team, effectively orphaning all my packages (docbook*, xml-core, xmlto, etc. pp)

Hi Daniel, Thanks a lot for maintaining these in good shape. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:24:17PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > x-post > > Hi everybody, > > I was part of the Debian XML/SGML team [1] for quite some time and it > was fun maintaining the whole DocBook toolchain. Unfortunately I'm

Failed to update repositories

Hello, I'm trying to set up distro_tracker locally to contribute. I'm following the guide here: https://tracker.debian.org/docs/contributing.html When running "./manage.py tracker_update_repositories", I get: """ FetchFailedException: W:Failed to fetch http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/oldolds

Bug#787246: tracker.debian.org: [regression] the package tracker seems to have lost the bugs box

Control: forcemerge 787163 -1 On Sat, 30 May 2015 12:32:16 +0200 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 30 May 2015 at 12:22, Francesco Poli (wintermute) > wrote: [...] > > I have recently noticed a regression: the package tracker seems to > > no longer display the bugs box [...] > > This see ms

Processed: Re: Bug#787246: tracker.debian.org: [regression] the package tracker seems to have lost the bugs box

Processing control commands: > forcemerge 787163 -1 Bug #787163 [tracker.debian.org] At the new package tracker the section bugs not shown Bug #787246 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: [regression] the package tracker seems to have lost the bugs box Merged 787163 787246 -- 787163: http:

Bug#787246: tracker.debian.org: [regression] the package tracker seems to have lost the bugs box

On 30 May 2015 at 12:22, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: > Package: tracker.debian.org > Severity: important > > Hello and thanks for developing the (new) Debian Package Tracker! > > I have recently noticed a regression: the package tracker seems to > no longer display the bugs box (which used

Bug#787246: tracker.debian.org: [regression] the package tracker seems to have lost the bugs box

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: important Hello and thanks for developing the (new) Debian Package Tracker! I have recently noticed a regression: the package tracker seems to no longer display the bugs box (which used to show up on the top of the right column). The bugs box seems to be miss